Bradley M Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know if the Preamble I wrote if perfect, because I got very
little feedback on it, and all the RFCs this group submitted. Those
last two weeks before RFC's were due, the traffic on this list was
basically dead, except for me posting revisions
Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Bradley M. Kuhn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL is not a contract, it's a copyright license, just like both the
proposed AL-2.0 and the original AL.
MY understanding after having talked to a number of licensing experts
about it in other places is that
David Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Satisfying Stillman might be good enough for the FSF and ODSN and GNU,
but that's quite insubstantial and superficial.
(It's Stallman; I wouldn't say anything, but I've seen that twice now.)
Note that Stallman is already satisfied with the license on
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Bradley M. Kuhn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
MY understanding after having talked to a number of licensing experts
about it in other places is that the GPL is both a copyright license and
a contract.
For
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Subject: Re: vtbl-based SVs and sv_setsv()
At 06:42 PM 1/13/01 -0800, Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
How is setting one SV from another going to be implemented?
My (admittedly vague) recollection was that it would be
something like
void sv_setsv(SV* dest, SV*
http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/eros-arch/2001-January/002683.html
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:49:57PM +, David L. Nicol wrote:
http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/eros-arch/2001-January/002683.html
Uhm. That's not *why* they're doing it, it's how they're doing it.
Did you get the right URL?
I went to a lecture by Knuth today on Literate Programming. He's got
At 03:30 PM 1/16/01 +, David Mitchell wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Subject: Re: vtbl-based SVs and sv_setsv()
At 06:42 PM 1/13/01 -0800, Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
How is setting one SV from another going to be implemented?
My (admittedly vague) recollection was that it
Simon Cozens wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:49:57PM +, David L. Nicol wrote:
http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/eros-arch/2001-January/002683.html
Uhm. That's not *why* they're doing it, it's how they're doing it.
Did you get the right URL?
I thought I did -- now that message is
bkuhn wrote:
I don't know if the Preamble I wrote if perfect, because I got very
little feedback on it, and all the RFCs this group submitted. Those
last two weeks before RFC's were due, the traffic on this list was
basically dead, except for me posting revisions of RFCs. I hope that I
10 matches
Mail list logo