Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 05:39:12PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > [We have FOO:BAR]
> > While this is reasonably true (and reasonably reasonable) it's not entirely
> > to the point. If we're going to provide a mechanism to define the syntax of
> > a mini-language (or a max
Good Practice Dave,
ehem! (clear my throat)
I,rather intimidated, volunteered for "Unicode string handling" PDD.
:)
Please feel free to send suggestions and directions!
Thanks in advance,
Soyoung
-Original Message-
From: Dave Storrs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 19,
Hey folks,
Ok, so I've picked up Dan's gauntlet on the debugging PDD. I've
got a pretty long list of things to put in it already, but if anyone would
care to send me their suggestions, I can get them integrated into the
initial draft. I probably won't have it ready by tomorrow, and I on
At 04:06 PM 4/19/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "NIS" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> NIS> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> struct arena {
> >> struct base_PMC[4096];
> >> long PMC_GC_data[4096];
> >> }
>
> NIS> Neat. (probe for page size?)
>
>wouldn't
At 07:39 PM 4/19/2001 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Okay, I've been pondering complex data structures, garbage collection, and
> >cache coherency for the past few days. (Between this, Unicode, the regex
> >engine, and backwards compatibility, I'll be
> "NIS" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NIS> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> struct arena {
>> struct base_PMC[4096];
>> long PMC_GC_data[4096];
>> }
NIS> Neat. (probe for page size?)
wouldn't that best be determined at configure/build time? and made into
a co
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Okay, I've been pondering complex data structures, garbage collection, and
>cache coherency for the past few days. (Between this, Unicode, the regex
>engine, and backwards compatibility, I'll be easy to spot at TPC 5.0. Just
>look for the tall guy weari
