Re: Opcode Dispatch

2001-08-05 Thread Uri Guttman
> "BCW" == Bryan C Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BCW> What may also need to be considered is what the expected growth BCW> of opcodes may actually be in future versions of Perl. In order BCW> to maintain upwards compatability, future opcodes will need to be BCW> added around th

Re: Opcode Dispatch

2001-08-05 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Saturday 04 August 2001 03:21 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 01:04 PM 7/30/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: > >I'll also rework my code generator and the logic to ramp it up to four or > >five hundred opcodes, which would be a little better test, I think. > >Anything else I should add or tweak

given when

2001-08-05 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
More questions regarding the new 'given when' construct. 1) Is a 'when' clause required? Is it: [ LABEL: ] given ( expr_1 ) { when expr_2 : block [ when expr_3 : block ...] expr_n [;] } or [ LABEL: ] given ( expr_1 ) {

RE: two-way hashes

2001-08-05 Thread Mitchell, Adam R
sounds like a good idea, but we can't limit multiple values, so it might be better if it returns an array. maybe the code should look more like this: @{value}hash = key or maybe @%{value}hash = key unless this clashes with something else -Original Message- From: raptor [mailto:[EMAIL