Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:40:44PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Actually, I'm thinking of something like the following... suppose the
original code is like:
label_foo:
loop body
branch_address:
branch label_foo
Add in the following:
e_handler_foo:
.local Perl
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:40:44PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> Actually, I'm thinking of something like the following... suppose the
> original code is like:
>
>label_foo:
>loop body
>branch_address:
>branch label_foo
>
> Add in the following:
>
>e_handler_foo:
>.l
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:54:27PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I think it's still fractionally broken, in that -Wno-format will
> erase -Wformat-nonliteral
A suitable anchor seemed to fix that.
Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:57:45PM +0100, Arthur Bergman wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 07:50 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
>
> > Arthur Bergman:
> > # This gets rid of the very annoying long double might change warning
> > # under Darwin...
> >
> > Thanks, applied (config/init/hints/darw
--- Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Burr writes:
> > But I confidently predict that no-one with write a useful
> > partial evaluator for perl6. The language is simply too big.
>
> Then again, there are some very talented people with a lot of free
> time in the Perl community; I wou
Alex Burr wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
I would hope the former. However, what about this compile-time
integral power macro[1]?
macro power ($x, $p) {
if $p > 0 {
{ $x * power($x, $p-1) }
}
else {
{ 1 }
}
}
That would hopef
Alex Burr writes:
> In theory you could write one as a perl6 macro, although it would be
> more convenient if there was someway of obtaining the syntax tree of a
> previously defined function other than quoting it (unless I've missed
> that?).
There is a large class of cool optimizations possibl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
> I would hope the former. However, what about this
compile-time
> integral power macro[1]?
>
> macro power ($x, $p) {
> if $p > 0 {
> { $x * power($x, $p-1) }
> }
> else {
> { 1 }
> }
> }
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
> I would hope the former. However, what about this compile-time
> integral power macro[1]?
>
> macro power ($x, $p) {
> if $p > 0 {
> { $x * power($x, $p-1) }
> }
> else {
> { 1 }
> }
> }
>
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 07:50 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
Arthur Bergman:
# This gets rid of the very annoying long double might change warning
# under Darwin...
Thanks, applied (config/init/hints/darwin.pl version 1.7).
However, can you see if the diff below my sig (applied against 1.7, no
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:53:20AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I built a fresh CVS parrot with garbage collection and linked parrot
> > and imcc against Electric Fence. A few tests failed. The (edited)
> > results are here:
>
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I built a fresh CVS parrot with garbage collection and linked parrot
> and imcc against Electric Fence. A few tests failed. The (edited)
> results are here:
> Core was generated by `./parrot --gc-debug t/op/interp_6.pasm'.
> Core was
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People make mistakes. Perhaps you should produce some errors if a user
> strays outside these rules. Garbage in, garbage out: Bad. Garbage in,
> error out: Good.
Albeit I did write, we need a simple interface to get at runtime libs
and includes, I
13 matches
Mail list logo
