--- Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Then again, there are some very talented people
with a lot of free
time in the Perl community; I wouldn't count it
out.
That looked to me like a Damian troll, hoping that
DC would pop up
and
I was reading through E6 again, and noticed something a little
troubling:
sub part ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is rw) {...}
Well, Iof course @_ Cis rw! Otherwise we wouldn't be able to
Cshift things off of it. What was actually meant, I presume, is:
sub part ([EMAIL PROTECTED] of (Object is
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:29:04AM +0300, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
People make mistakes. Perhaps you should produce some errors if a user
strays outside these rules. Garbage in, garbage out: Bad. Garbage in,
error out: Good.
It really does that. I mean that it returns a when it
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:40:44PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
When there are no events queued, for any thread, then we change branch
e_handler_foo back into branch label_foo, for speed.
Do we need to do this last bit explicitly? Or can we do it
Are you saying:
concat_dirnames(C:\foo, bar) == error?
Yes. Even if the file spec tool was smart enough just like you and me
it would never be able to unriddle what output it would have to produce
as a result of the following call on Mac:
concat_dirnames(disk:dir_a, dir_b);
if disk was a
On Thursday, Sep 11, 2003, at 16:38 Europe/London, Ovid wrote:
--- Andrew Savige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, that 'grind' looks like a very handy command but I'm a bit
confused about how you use it. Is it just a handy general-purpose
command or do you use it specifically as part of make test
5.8.1 recently started failing 2 tests in op/cproto.t, on pop(), shift();
this only happens on one box, ie RH-7.2, not RH-9, and I havent tried
a make distclean, so I havent reported it to p5p.
Instead I decided that some false laziness was in order, and I should go
digging.
But, I thought it
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Next Apocalypse is objects, and that'll take time.
Objects are *worth* more time than a lot of the other topics.
Arguably, they're just as important as subroutines, in a modern
language.
Speaking of objects... are we going to have a built-in object
Jonadab the Unsightly One writes:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Next Apocalypse is objects, and that'll take time.
Objects are *worth* more time than a lot of the other topics.
Arguably, they're just as important as subroutines, in a modern
language.
Speaking of objects...
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
Also, the standard library, however large or small that will be, will
definitely be mutable at runtime. There'll be none of that Java you
can't subclass String, because we think you shouldn't crap.
Java's standard class library is a mishmash of things
Ovid wrote:
I've just made it available at
http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/downloads/grind.gz
It needs more work, including allowing descending into directories (via
File::Find or a similar mechanism) and having pre and post actions.
I haven't figured out the best way to do the
11 matches
Mail list logo
