Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
Brent isn't adult? Gosh!
BRENT_D = 36/2.04739336492890995260663507109 = appr. 17 ages and 296 days
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #23815]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23815
This fixes an apparent obvious typo in the Jako Makefile. I also put in
the
* e.g. add_n_i_n = add_n_n_i
* div_n_ic_n = div_n_nc_n
* div_n_i_n = set_n_i ; div_n_n_n
+ * ge_n_ic_ic = ge_nc_ic
-+-+
| |
| |
_|_|
(Moving to internals. Definitely not a language discussion.)
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Sorry if this is a crack fuelled idea, and sorry that I don't
have a patch handy to implement it, but might the following
work:
With the same caveats (coke, no diff), try this strategy on for size:
The
Steve Fink:
# On Sep-15, Brent Dax wrote:
# Steve Fink:
# # 2. typedef struct Parrot_Interp stuff. Brent, you're the man -- do
you
# # still need some agreement on conventions before you rename our
world?
#
# You mean we might actually (gasp!) get this done? Horrors!
#
# Huh? No, I just
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Andy Dougherty wrote:
[ \d+\.0{6} vs \d+ ]
I expect these are a result of Leo's recent work on the perl PMCs, rather
than a Solaris or perl version issue. There were similar problems in the
base test suite for a bit.
Yes. Sorry, I
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:30:06PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
The focus here, I think, is the following problem class:
sub twenty_five() { 25 }# Optimized to inline
sub foo() {
print twenty_five; # Inlined
twenty_five := { 36 };
print twenty_five;
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Great. But will it also be possible to add methods (or modify them)
to an existing class at runtime?
Unless the class has been explicitly closed, yes.
That strikes me as back-to-front.
The
Steve Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be tempting to change all pushtop,pushbottom,poptop,popbottom
ops into ones that had the start register and number of registers as
arguments.
No. These ops are used to save registers for the caller and not for
argument passing.
Yes, I know
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This fixes an apparent obvious typo in the Jako Makefile.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Gordon Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * ge_n_ic_ic = ge_nc_ic
This should of course read ge_n_nc_ic on the RHS.
| A C D E G I|
| N S T V|
WTF ...
leo
My, is this a conspiracy to drag -internals onto -language to make it look alive? :)
You guys almost made me drop my coffee mug...
--
Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research Scientist, Expway http://expway.com/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... spending the morning of your 36th birthday
Happy birthday to you and us.
l - A full year has passed, hasn't it? - eo
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
(Moving to internals. Definitely not a language discussion.)
I dunno--while not a language discussion, it does help the people who're
involved understand the difficulties in what they're asking for. (Larry,
luckily, is aware of this stuff, but many
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This sounds like the beginning of a whole set of things like Warning
#238: suboptimal implementation of xxx. Are you sure you know what you
are doing?
If the user turns on optimization and the compiler finds such code, yes,
why not.
SBCL, a fast and
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gordon Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| A C D E G I|
| N S T V|
WTF ...
Hangman -- the goal is to guess the letters of a
[charnames.pm is unavailable in 5.00503.]
Commenting out the 'use charnames' in String.pm, I only get two failures
for languages/perl6 with perl5.00503. They are
t/compiler/b_4.p6, which is
sub main() {
print \c[^J]; # Control-Char
print \c[REVERSE SOLIDUS]\n; # Named Unicode
print
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Ph. Marek wrote:
You can, of course, stop even potential optimization once the first I can
change the rules operation is found, but since even assignment can change
the rules that's where we are right now. We'd like to get better by
optimizing based on what we can see
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:49:52AM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Austin Hastings wrote:
Given that threads are present, and given the continuation based
nature of the interpreter, I assume that code blocks can be closured.
So why not allocate JITed methods on the heap and manage them as
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:30:06PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
[snipped]
No, I think Parrot will still only JIT IN registers. Optimization
includes way more than just JIT.
Do you mean that array accesses will not be jitted? If an array is declared
exact type (not subclassable) and that the
# New Ticket Created by Steve Clark
# Please include the string: [perl #23819]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23819
Attached is a patch file of a couple of trivial janitorial-type fixes
to
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #23822]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23822
The following patch eliminates the following (correct!) warnings during
the
David Storrs wrote:
This discussion seems to contain two separate problems, and I'm not
always sure which one is being addressed. The components I see are:
1) Detecting when the assumptions have been violated and the code has
to be changed; and,
2) Actually making the change after we
--- Gordon Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Storrs wrote:
This discussion seems to contain two separate problems, and I'm not
always sure which one is being addressed. The components I see
are:
1) Detecting when the assumptions have been violated and the code
has
to be
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... spending the morning of your 36th birthday
Happy birthday to you and us.
Thanks.
25 matches
Mail list logo