Re: Safe Mode for Parrot -- Need a volunteer

Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ..., but I didn't want to make 2 * N new .c files to get paranoid versions of the N core .c files now. One safe core, built separately with its own Ops files ought to be enough, IMHO. I thought about prederef a bit right before submitting this, and

Re: LF needed at end of pasm files?

Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd imagine this indicates a behavior change in imcc at some point. Or no one ran these tests since assemble.pl was used :) It's easy enough to add the LFs, but it might be better to not require the final line end character. The parsing pod says that

[perl #24115] [PATCH] update of strings.pod

# New Ticket Created by Michael Scott # Please include the string: [perl #24115] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24115 I've made the changes necessary to bring strings.pod up-to-date. Here's the

Re: [perl #24115] [PATCH] update of strings.pod

Michael Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've made the changes necessary to bring strings.pod up-to-date. Applied, thanks. leo

More fun with argument passing

Ok, I'm back to argument passing. I'm starting a new thread because I'm lazy and I have to scroll back too far in my mailer to see the old arg passing thread. :-) And yes, most of this message should also be on -languages. Could somebody tell me where I go wrong: If you have a prototype sub f

Re: [CVS ci] pcre pattern match example

Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fair enough, but I don't want to ship the PCRE sources, nor require them for parrot to build, so there's something of a problem there, unfortunately. So I'll make a lib ouf of it. Where do you prefer it to go: * runtime/parrot/lib/ * library/ leo

Re: More fun with argument passing

Steve Fink writes: Ok, I'm back to argument passing. I'm starting a new thread because I'm lazy and I have to scroll back too far in my mailer to see the old arg passing thread. :-) And yes, most of this message should also be on -languages. Which it now is. Although, there are some

Re: More fun with argument passing

On Oct-05, Luke Palmer wrote: Steve Fink writes: Ok, I'm back to argument passing. I'm starting a new thread because I'm lazy and I have to scroll back too far in my mailer to see the old arg passing thread. :-) And yes, most of this message should also be on -languages. Which it now