Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon:
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
parrot_alias(a, 'b', # dest: Python is unified, no need for a category
here
a, 'b', 'scalar') # src: Perl is not unified, so source category is
required
It seem
No no no. You've all got it all wrong. Except for the
Dans. :)
> Namespaces are going to be *simple*.
> They do two things, and only two things.
>
> 1) They provide a hierarchy for other namespaces
> 2) They bind names to PMCs
And that's all good. Here's what Perl can do:
$foo becomes namespace
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon:
> > (This does pose a problem going the other way, but I suspect Perl
> > could simply mark its own packages in some way, and fall back to a
> > simpler scheme, such as "ignore the sigil", when it's munging another
--- Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On cygwin, test 21 fails too:
>
> t/library/streams..ok 20/21# Failed
> test (t/library/streams.t
> at line 1447)
> t/library/streams..NOK 21
To be honest, I have not been following this thread so
I don't know if there is
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I had submitted a patch some time ago that never
got
>> applied enabling tests for threads, timer, and
>> extend_13.
> Overlooked? Please rediff and resend.
I will do - likely tomorrow.
> > It say
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 01:10, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Parakeet is an object-oriented Forth-like stack language for the Parrot
> > VM. It is written in PIR and compiled its code directly to PIR.
>
> Should it go into CVS abd being included in 0.1.
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log:
marked test #13 and #19 as TODO - they are failing due to a GC problem
I'm still fighting with these two. I've a stripped down version of _13
using all the constructs like in the test + library - no GC error -
strange.
Have it run
On Thursday 30 September 2004 11:16, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Log:
> > marked test #13 and #19 as TODO - they are failing due to a GC problem
>
> I'm still fighting with these two. I've a stripped down version of _13
> using all the constructs like in t
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log:
> marked test #13 and #19 as TODO - they are failing due to a GC problem
I'm still fighting with these two. I've a stripped down version of _13
using all the constructs like in the test + library - no GC error -
strange.
leo
According to Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon:
> Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >parrot_alias(a, 'b', # dest: Python is unified, no need for a
> > category here
> > a, 'b', 'scalar') # src: Perl is not unified, so source
> > category is required
>
> It se
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Juerd wrote:
operator in Perl5 too: do you know actual code in which $_ was really used
there?
s/\Q$_/$foo{$_}/g for keys %foo;
D'Oh!
Michele
--
I have never seen it work, either, since I have never used Word. The
stories users of it tell me are sufficient for keeping me gl
# New Ticket Created by Adam Thomason
# Please include the string: [perl #31771]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31771 >
Sometime recently the 'testexec' Makefile target stopped working. It
turns out tha
Jeff Clites wrote:
That's it. No typing, no classification, no nothing.
By postpending a null character, below, you _are_ doing
typing/classification, of course. And, what about subs?
I was kind of inspired here. Just stick with me.
As Larry said, it's best to prepend it. And then we can call i
Michele Dondi skribis 2004-09-30 10:30 (+0200):
> PS: this is something that I'd like in the substitution part of a s///e
> operator in Perl5 too: do you know actual code in which $_ was really used
> there?
s/\Q$_/$foo{$_}/g for keys %foo;
Juerd
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, Perl5 doesn't describe itself that way. The Camel states,
> "Note that we can use the same name for $days, @days, and %days without
> Perl getting confused."
While that's fine for Perl it doesn't help, if you want to access one
distinct "days" f
Kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Just wondering (again), in order to be able to follow discussion on matters:
> What is the difference between an "internal" exception and a "real"
> exception (as if the
> first one isn't a real exception...).
The internal ones are mostly unclassified rea
Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parakeet is an object-oriented Forth-like stack language for the Parrot
> VM. It is written in PIR and compiled its code directly to PIR.
Should it go into CVS abd being included in 0.1.1?
> -Michel
leo
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up until a couple of weeks ago, all the threads tests
> were passing on Cygwin. I had submitted a patch some
> time ago that never got applied enabling tests for
> threads, timer, and extend_13 that never got applied.
> I figured there was good reason ..
I've read S5, and hopefully I've understood the new $-mechanism,
that BTW seems very good to me. Only I have a suggestion that I hope not
to be too awkward.
Why isn't matched text aliesed to $_ (topicalized) too? After all taking
for example, and simplicity, a substitution (but the same would h
19 matches
Mail list logo
