Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:30 -0800, chromatic wrote:
>> Adding -mregnames to the as call makes it compile for me, but it
>> apparently doesn't export the symbol properly:
> Ah, here it is. For whatever reason, it doesn't strip the leading
> underscore from
What's the status of this patch? It was never applied or commented on.
If the tinderbox section is what's holding the patch up, I vote to
apply it: that's what CVS is for.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:38:43 +0200 (CEST), Stepan Roh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Golden wrote:
Ofer Nave wrote:
I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my
first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not
yet written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production
currently). I've also never written any formal test
Ofer Nave wrote:
I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my
first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not
yet written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production
currently). I've also never written any formal tests in perl at all
(u
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:09:26PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:36:00PM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
>
> : Thanks for the mind expanding reply.
>
> You're welcome. Next time don't eat blue sugar cubes from my frig. :-)
"I know what you're thinking. 'Why, oh why, didn'
I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my
first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not yet
written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production
currently). I've also never written any formal tests in perl at all
(using the Test::*
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:36:00PM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
: At first I was overwhelmed by your reply, but it's soaking in... :)
Er, sorry. Sometimes I get so excited about the Promised Land that I
forget we're still standing ankle deep in dying tube worms somewhere
out in the middle of the
I hit the wrong macro key, causing the message to be sent to the wrong
mailing list. I'm very sorry; please ignore this thread.
Michael G Schwern skribis 2005-03-03 16:21 (-0500):
> I see this all the time. Phone numbers. Credit card numbers. Postal codes.
> I mean, christ. $input =~ s/\D+//g;
Phone numbers: don't strip a prefixed +.
Postal codes: if it's international, don't strip anything. My postal
code is 3316 GG,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:07:44PM -0500, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> So any particular reason you've dropped 5.4.5 support?
Lack of qr//. I might put it back, since it's not that widespread.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:59:42PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> I'm also no longer supporting Perls before 5.005_03. I figure if
> someone's using a Perl > 7+ years old, they're not going to care about
> new Test::Harness.
My logic for supporting old Perls is a little different. If you're stuck
i
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:14:18AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> All tests pass for T::M 0.47, but fail on 0.54
Lexical::Attributes does not pass tests for me with either 0.47 nor 0.54
using 5.8.1RC3 (the OS X shipped Perl) nor a clean 5.8.6. Output from the
5.8.6 run attached.
With V I see th
On 03/03/05 11:25 -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
> : Hi all,
> :
> : I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the
> : build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical
> : variable $?OS
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:22:19AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> This program hangs when it hits is_deeply. I eventually get an "out of
> memory" error.
I don't think I saw a followup from you on this. Did you try it with the
latest version of Test::More?
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:00:02PM -0500, Tom Moertel wrote:
> How I do do this now is somewhat hackish. For the duration of a
> property check, I redefine some Test::Builder internals like so:
>
> sub check_property {
> no warnings 'redefine';
> my $property = shift;
> my $diags = []
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:25:04AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: Well, hey, we've said that any object can behave as a hash of its
: public accessors, so it really don't matter which way they write it.
I guess another practical difference is that if you say
$*OS
you get an undefined value, wher
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
: Hi all,
:
: I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the
: build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical
: variable $?OS.
:
: There are a lot of other config values that seem
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:30 -0800, chromatic wrote:
> Adding -mregnames to the as call makes it compile for me, but it
> apparently doesn't export the symbol properly:
Ah, here it is. For whatever reason, it doesn't strip the leading
underscore from the symbol name. (GNU as allows symbols to st
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 17:22 +0100, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> ops/core_ops_switch.c
> as -o src/asmfun.o src/asmfun.s
> src/asmfun.s: Assembler messages:
> src/asmfun.s:6: Error: unsupported relocation against f14
Adding -mregnames to the as call makes it compile for me, but it
apparently doesn't
Hi all,
I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the
build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical
variable $?OS.
There are a lot of other config values that seem like they don't really need
their own global. Things like 'privlib' and 'inst
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:25:30AM -0500, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
: Another edge case: is it legal to have an optional Pair in the
: signature? That is:
: sub foo($x, Pair ?$y, +$z){...}
:
: If yes, what does this parse as:
: foo(10, z => 5);
It ends up equivalent to foo(10, y => (z =
Le Thursday 3 March 2005 11:56, Leopold Toetsch a écrit :
> I've now committed the proposed changes,
> see tickets: #32989, #32514, #34072
>
> If you have a PPC based box, please give it a try.
My ppc box is a Mandrake cooker (devel distro): I ran:
Unfortunally, I don't have the C/asm knowledge t
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34325]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34325 >
Placeholder ticket for Parrot release 0.2.0
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34324]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34324 >
Placeholder ticket for Parrot Release 0.1.3
Another edge case: is it legal to have an optional Pair in the
signature? That is:
sub foo($x, Pair ?$y, +$z){...}
If yes, what does this parse as:
foo(10, z => 5);
If z => 5 is bound to $y, then $y is almost mandatory. ('almost' because
we can still say foo(10); ). (and then can we als
I've now committed the proposed changes,
see tickets: #32989, #32514, #34072
If you have a PPC based box, please give it a try.
Thanks,
leo
Le Thursday 3 March 2005 10:14, Leopold Toetsch a écrit :
> Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > Le Wednesday 2 March 2005 17:04, Leopold Toetsch a écrit :
> >>>blib/lib/libparrot.so => $(LIBDIR)/libparrot.so
> >>>whatever/file.pmc => $(PARROTLIBDIR)/whatever/file.pmc
> >>
> >>Sounds reasonable. What about t
1) dynclasses/py* emits currently some warnings:
- pyint.c:1415 warning: declaration of xxx shadows previous local
[ 6 total ]
- pylist.pmc:35: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows global declaration
[ 6 total ]
- same in pystring.pmc
PS index is a global libc function, the warnings are prod
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Wednesday 2 March 2005 17:04, Leopold Toetsch a écrit :
blib/lib/libparrot.so => $(LIBDIR)/libparrot.so
whatever/file.pmc => $(PARROTLIBDIR)/whatever/file.pmc
Sounds reasonable. What about the icu files?
icu use autotools, maybe let autotools decide, but we should find a
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ note: slightly modifed version number ;) ]
> So Dan's string stuff has been rolled into cvs main (along with a huge
> # of leo addon patches...)
Yeah. The string stuff has again reached the functionality it had
earlier, e.g. printing utf8 strings w
Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
this is a largish patch that deals with some issues in the test suite.
Feedback is very welcome, as there are consequences for future tests.
Without having a look at the patch this all sounds very reasonable. I
presume it just works, so I'd say: check it in ;)
31 matches
Mail list logo
