Hello.
Parrot (revision 12486) was built on DragonFlyBSD (1.4.0) with attached patch
(svn diff).
make test result is
t/op/calling.t 1 256921 1.09% 91
t/pmc/objects.t3 768744 5.41% 73-75
(2 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 11 tests and 388 subtests skipped.
Fa
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #39081]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39081 >
If a subclass doesn't define an "__init" method, then creating
a new instance of
Actually, I'll add a few more things to my reply, which should be helpful ...
At 5:11 PM -0700 5/4/06, Darren Duncan wrote:
At 10:51 AM +1200 5/5/06, Sam Vilain wrote:
>Moreover, the Relation type has these
operators that the Set type doesn't have: rename(), project(),
restrict(), extend(), j
At 10:51 AM +1200 5/5/06, Sam Vilain wrote:
>Moreover, the Relation type has these
operators that the Set type doesn't have: rename(), project(),
restrict(), extend(), join(), divide(), summarize(), group(),
>ungroup(), wrap(), unwrap(), matching(), etc.
Is there a reference for the meaning
Darren Duncan wrote:
>Speaking a little more technically, a Relation has 2 main components,
>its heading and its body. The heading is a set of 0..N keys (called
>"attributes" in relation-land), and the body is a set of 0..N
>Mappings (called "tuples" in relation-land), where they set of keys
As I carry on in my spare time to implement a Relation type for Perl
6, I would like to use some of the simpler types that were added to
the Synopsis recently and seem to lack a lot of explanatory details
that older types have, and moreover they don't seem to be implemented
yet in Pugs.
So I
Thanks, applied as r12503.
These errors also occurred on windows/x86 for me, using the Visual
Studio 2005 Express Edition.
On 5/4/06, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:56:44PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to explain this. The long dot here does seem to be
solving more important problems. Now I'm not as up to date with Perl 6 syntax
as I once was, nor as muc
On 5/4/06, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Laire skribis 2006-05-04 14:55 (+0300):
> When reading Synopses, I sometimes notice some mistakes or typos,
> which I'd like to submit a patch for, but it's not easy to do so as I
> don't know where to get the source.
Have you tried s/html/pod/?
Not entirely related, but:
it would be great if someone wrote usable wiki software (with revision
control support) in Perl 6, and could maintain it so that it keeps up
with Pugs. Because of the current state of Pugs, it will have to be
written in a very simple way.
Especially if it looks great on
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:59:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but also people on the semi-inside, trying to remember things like
> "I'm sure there's a reason other then C<< if condition_without_parens
> {block} >> that we can't have C<< %foo {'bar'} >> DTRT, but I can't
> remember it
On May 4, 2006, at 10:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:44:29AM -0400, David K Storrs wrote:
Also, the page should talk about why it is difficult to do what is
being done. Ask the reader questions: "You want to . How do you do it?" Then offer up an analysis of vari
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:44:29AM -0400, David K Storrs wrote:
> Also, the page should talk about why it is difficult to do what is
> being done. Ask the reader questions: "You want to continuations / have coroutines / embedd yacc in your language /
> whatever>. How do you do it?" Then of
I was chatting with a P6 person the other day (who can remain
nameless unless he chooses to identify himself). He made the
following observation:
Every time we're lambasted for how long Perl 6 is taking I remind
myself that Short Term Thinking is the norm now.
I think there are a couple
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:56:44PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >But then again, as I said, I really don't see the problem that is being
> >solved.
>
> This "long-dot" can be used for many things, not just method calls.
Thanks for taking the
Markus Laire skribis 2006-05-04 14:55 (+0300):
> When reading Synopses, I sometimes notice some mistakes or typos,
> which I'd like to submit a patch for, but it's not easy to do so as I
> don't know where to get the source.
Have you tried s/html/pod/? :)
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_jue
When reading Synopses, I sometimes notice some mistakes or typos,
which I'd like to submit a patch for, but it's not easy to do so as I
don't know where to get the source.
Could each Synopsis include a link to the corresponding .pod (if it's
available in Internet, that is), so that submitting pat
On 5/1/06, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe you all write your code differently to me, but looking through a
load of my OO code I had trouble finding three method calls in a row to
any methods on any objects, let alone six calls to the same method name
on different objects.
If I saw
18 matches
Mail list logo
