Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
But come to think of it, if we had something like Capture PMCs
available as a standard type (and an easy way to generate them in
PIR), then the existing :vtable('init') would be quite sufficient.
To steal from Perl 6's C<< \(...) >> capture syntax:
$P0 = new 'Foo::Ba
Matt Diephouse wrote:
One common use of anonymous subs in a dynamic language is
for later exporting them into another package (or multiple different
packages). In that case, you really don't want the sub to retain a link
to its defining namespace, you want it to fully adopt the namespace it's
p
On Monday 20 November 2006 14:20, Patrick R.Michaud wrote:
> I don't seem to be able to use iterators on subclasses of
> ResizablePMCArray. Here's an example:
>
> $ cat t.pir
> .sub main :main
> .local pmc ar, iter
> $P0 = subclass 'ResizablePMCArray', 'MyArray'
>
>
Bob Rogers wrote:
> Allison Randal wrote:
The proposal starts off talking about Perl 5's 'local' and Perl 6's
'temp'. They are lexical in nature (though they're more feature-rich
than simple lexicals). They only exist within a specific lexical scope,
and "roll back" on exiting tha
+The ultimate goal of Parrot is portability to more-or-less the same
+platforms as Perl 5, including AIX, BeOS, BSD/OS, Cygwin, Darwin,
+Debian, DG/UX, Domain/OS, DragonFlyBSD, DYNIX/ptx, Embedix, EPOC,
+FreeBSD, Gentoo, HP-UX, IRIX, Linux, Mac OS (Classic), Mac OS X,
+Mandriva, Minix, MS-DOS, Net
Author: allison
Date: Wed Dec 6 18:45:38 2006
New Revision: 16037
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd01_overview.pod
Log:
[pdd]: Readding Tru64 to list of Parrot target platforms, after Jarkko's
recent patch.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd01_overview.pod
=
Author: allison
Date: Wed Dec 6 18:30:33 2006
New Revision: 16036
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd01_overview.pod
Log:
[pdd]: Adding notes to the overview PDD on Parrot's platform targets.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd01_overview.pod
==
Suppose I have a gather block that spawns several threads, each of which
calls take several times. Obviously, the relative order of items returned
from take in different threads is indeterminate, but is it at least
guaranteed that no object returned from take is lost?
Joe Gottman
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 22:07 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> Constant PMCs are marked, but are constant STRINGs?
As STRINGs aren't pointing to other items, there's no extra code to deal with
constant strings. They are marked, when refered to from other locations or
maybe not. This is ok, as the
We have too many bugs. We could use more programmers and testers and
documenters.
and some examples need to update, for example, replace deprecated syntax with
new, etc. For newcomer, examples is good start point to learn, but
only if it's up to date.
10 matches
Mail list logo
