Hello,
PJS (Parrot JavaScript) allows a number to be NaN. The result of
comparing an NaN to any value is false (thus all of NaN == NaN, NaN <
NaN, NaN > NaN, NaN <= NaN, NaN >= NaN evaluate to false).
There is only the vtable function C that a PMC can implement to
define ordering.
Parrot assumes
purl in #parrot now supports message relay, thanks to Masque++.
to send a message to another user via purl, you can (either in
private conversation with purl or in #parrot), type:
19:15 <@Fred> msg Coke The frobulator is borken.
19:15 <+purl> Message for coke stored.
Then, when purl sees the
Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Tue Aug 28 19:35:12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James E Keenan wrote:
I'll put a TODO block around it until I can get tuit.
TODO block implemented in r20894.
Well, that TODO block is around the wrong test, (it's th
Andy Dougherty wrote:
This problem is not really Solaris-specific at all. It's simply that
the emulation is missing a bunch of methods. From perldoc -f tie:
A class implementing a file handle should have the following methods:
TIEHANDLE classname, LIST
READ this, scalar, l
On Tue Apr 03 10:37:13 2007, particle wrote:
> lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/PCCMETHOD.pm contains a number of constants, defined
> for use in the package. these constants should be generated during the
> configure process and included, following the DRY principle (don't
> repeat yourself.)
In r20917, I commit
while trying to write a test for subclassing the Exporter PMC in PIR,
i came across a problem: there's no way i can find to call a
supermethod. the supermethodcc opcode isn't implemented. and even if
it was, there's no PIR sugar to make the call pretty. the Super PMC is
broken and has been for some
Author: allison
Date: Wed Aug 29 08:45:07 2007
New Revision: 20916
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd17_pmc.pod
Log:
[pdd]: Adding some responses to Jonathan's proposal on handling inheritance
from C PMCs to PIR classes.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd17_pmc.pod
===
On 8/29/07, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/08/2007, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > as it turns out, the function can return any integer, so the code must
> > be updated. but why isn't that function in the tags file?
>
> I was trying to work that out just recently as well
On 29/08/2007, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as it turns out, the function can return any integer, so the code must
> be updated. but why isn't that function in the tags file?
I was trying to work that out just recently as well. For some reason
ctags isn't picking up functions defined in
while reviewing a patch this morning
(http://perlsix.org/svn/parrot/revision/?rev=20876,) the commit
message didn't match the code precisely.
comment:
[imcc] Checking that the index passed to the C array in
C isn't negative, which it potentially can be. This
resolves Coverity CID 21.
code:
On 8/29/07, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:44:13PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've recently added a test to the coding standards tests which checks
> > for a copyright statement, and that the copyright date is up to date.
> > After a
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Aug 28 19:35:12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > James E Keenan wrote:
>
> > I'll put a TODO block around it until I can get tuit.
> >
>
> TODO block implemented in r20894.
Well, that TODO block is around the wrong test, (it's the test
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:44:13PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently added a test to the coding standards tests which checks
> for a copyright statement, and that the copyright date is up to date.
> After a discussion on #parrot, Coke made the observation that maybe
> the mos
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > inter_progs.01.t
> > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callbacks in the
> > Solaris hints file. I don't know offhand
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:44:13PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> I've recently added a test to the coding standards tests which checks
> for a copyright statement, and that the copyright date is up to date.
> After a discussion on #parrot, Coke made the observation that maybe
> the most recent date
Hi all,
I've recently added a test to the coding standards tests which checks
for a copyright statement, and that the copyright date is up to date.
After a discussion on #parrot, Coke made the observation that maybe
the most recent date shouldn't be the same as the current year because
the file mi
On Wed Feb 08 06:55:12 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ~ tests will be designed to detect differences between the official
> copyright text (README) and text files in the repository, with an
> exception list for files that do not contain the copyright message
A new test along these lines has be
Author: larry
Date: Wed Aug 29 03:57:51 2007
New Revision: 14441
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Clarification of Ps/Pe vs Bidi requested by sunnavy++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
--- doc/tru
Author: larry
Date: Wed Aug 29 03:15:06 2007
New Revision: 14440
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Block comments removed in favor of simple syntax error in case of ambiguity
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Author: larry
Date: Wed Aug 29 03:14:08 2007
New Revision: 14439
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Forgot to move description of ff too.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S0
Author: larry
Date: Wed Aug 29 03:12:28 2007
New Revision: 14438
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Precedence of ff and fff changed to be the same as ??!!
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/t
21 matches
Mail list logo
