# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #45935]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45935
hi,
a code snippet like this:
the_value = new 'Type'
the_value = 42
is in my
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #46007]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46007
Parrot is no longer licensed under the GPL directly (though it is
available
Allison Randal (via RT) schrieb:
Review these languages and decide whether to update the license or move
them to the google-code repository for Parrot languages:
languages/m4/README:15
What is the legal situation for Parrot m4?
Personally I would like to put 'languages/m4' under
On 07/10/02 19:05 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
Jerome Quelin wrote:
other question: which directory has the higher priority for you?
They all need to be fixed before we roll the branch back into the trunk, so
they're all equally important.
committed some find_type removals: r21771, r21772,
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 10:26:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: colink
Date: Wed Oct 3 10:26:13 2007
New Revision: 21796
Modified:
branches/unified_testing/BRANCH_TODO
Log:
[unified testing]
Update BRANCH_TODO, moving coding standard items down (and maybe removed
later since
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
languages/m4/README:15
What is the legal situation for Parrot m4?
Personally I would like to put 'languages/m4' under Artistic 2.0.
But I'm not sure whether this isn't a derived work. I implemented Parrot
m4 by:
i. Looking at the GNU m4 source code
ii.
Slowly PGE and PGE::Perl6Regex are being updated to work with pdd15oo.
Several existing tools and languages in the repo still make use of
PGE::P6Regex, which uses the regex syntax that was in Synopsis 5
prior to February 2007.
Rather than spend the time converting the P6Regex to work with
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 20:06:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+$| = 1;
+is($|, 1, output autoflush is set);
I keep seeing this code, and I'm not sure why it's there. Why do you need to
enable autoflush in the tests? You're not printing anything (Test::Builder
uses very different
On 10/3/07, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 20:06:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+$| = 1;
+is($|, 1, output autoflush is set);
I keep seeing this code, and I'm not sure why it's there. Why do you need to
enable autoflush in the tests? You're not printing
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 22:12:36 jerry gay wrote:
hrmm. now that you mention it, i believe autoflush is on by default in
perls since 5.6.1, and since we require a minimum of 5.8.0 for parrot,
i believe that requirement renders this test moot.
It *shouldn't* be on by default in any
10 matches
Mail list logo
