On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:45:24AM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
: Hi,
:
: If system() is now called run()
:
: What replaces backtick or qx{} ?
qqx[] or qq:x[] would be the exact equivalent. qx[] or q:x[] would
be the same with single-quote semantics. (There are probably no
backticks for that purp
Hi,
If system() is now called run()
What replaces backtick or qx{} ?
Gabor
Hello,
I'm Adrian, the Summer of Code student who is working on the test suite hosted
in the Pugs repo. You might have seen me on IRC as Auzon.
A while back, I started a file (pugs/t/TASKS) in the repository to hold a list
of things that need to be done on the test suite. I want to make it easi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:18:40PM -0700, Chris Fields wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Chris Fields
> # Please include the string: [perl #55962]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55962 >
>
> This is actuall
This patch fixes a test suite failure in t/codingstd/perlcritic.t
The minimum required version for Perl::Critic was 1.03, but the
&default_forbidden_words method was not introduced until 1.082. I've
bumped up the version number in the test to ensure it skips properly.
Also, the Perl::Critic docs
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 09:06 -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2008 21:06:58 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>
> > Index: src/dynext.c
> > ===
> > --- src/dynext.c(revision 28459)
> > +++ src/dynext.c(working cop
On Sun May 25 13:15:10 2008, tetragon wrote:
> And here's a newer version of the patch that I use. This one changes
> config/init/hints/darwin.pm instead of config/init/defaults.pm
Patch applied to trunk in r28513. Thanks to tetragon, testers who have
posted so far, and participants in Parrot/R
On Tue Jun 17 21:06:58 2008, japhb wrote:
> The attached patch is courtesy of donaldh++. It has been tested on
> cygwin and Debian/i686. Please someone test on Mac OS X, so that I can
> commit it.
>
Works for me on Mac OS X 10.4 (Panther) on PPC.
kid51
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 21:06:58 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> Index: src/dynext.c
> ===
> --- src/dynext.c(revision 28459)
> +++ src/dynext.c(working copy)
> @@ -276,12 +276,10 @@
> /* And on cygwin replace a lea
Raphael Descamps (via RT) wrote:
> Attached patch modify chop.t to add one file and four more successful
> tests to spectest_regression.
Applied as r20859 of the pugs repository, thank you.
Note that the spec tests live in the pugs repository (
http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/t/spec to more specific
On Tue Jun 17 17:12:30 2008, japhb wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:27 -0700, Packy Anderson wrote:
> > Here's the command I'm using to configure and make
> > $ make realclean; CC="gcc-4.0" CX="g++-4.0" perl Configure.pl --
> > cc="$CC" --cxx="$CX" --link="$CX" --ld="$CX" --optimize; make -j 2
>
# New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell
# Please include the string: [perl #55978]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55978 >
The attached patch is courtesy of donaldh++. It has been tested on
cygwin and Deb
On Tue Jun 17 17:12:30 2008, japhb wrote:
* Does it still fail if you don't override the compiler and linker?
* Does it still fail if you don't run a parallel make?
* Does it still fail if you don't configure with --optimize?
* Does it still fail for just 'make realclean; perl Configure.pl;
mak
On Tue Jun 17 17:12:30 2008, japhb wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:27 -0700, Packy Anderson wrote:
> > Here's the command I'm using to configure and make
> > $ make realclean; CC="gcc-4.0" CX="g++-4.0" perl Configure.pl --
> > cc="$CC" --cxx="$CX" --link="$CX" --ld="$CX" --optimize; make -j 2
>
On Sat Mar 29 08:41:56 2008, rblasch wrote:
>
> t/op/sprintf.t
> not ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not
> skip: MSWin32 VMS hpux:10.20 openbsd netbsd:1.5 irix actual: >0<
>
This particular TODO-ed test has begun to "unexpectedly" PASS for me on
linux-i386 and darw
Allison:
1. Are you still experiencing these problems?
2. Since you said that these problems occurred after an upgrade, can I
assume that you're working on PPC?
3. Have you had a chance to look at the related ticket I mentioned in
my last post?
Thanks.
kid51
16 matches
Mail list logo
