HaloO,
David Green wrote:
On 2008-Oct-22, at 10:03 am, TSa wrote:
Note that types have a fundamentally different task in a signature
than name and position have. The latter are for binding arguments to
parameters. The types however are for selection of dispatch target.
Names do that too; I
Chris ():
How safe is it today to pre-compile Rakudo code to PIR and expect that to
behave identically to as if I compiled from .pm at runtime? I believe PCT
is just generating PIR anyway, so my initial guess is that there should be
no differences. Are there any gotchas, like compile-time
# New Ticket Created by Chris Dolan
# Please include the string: [perl #60164]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60164
The attached one-line patch makes Rakudo's Test.pm methods (ok(), is
(), etc)
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #60168]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60168
Hello.
I've (slightly) refactor Junction.pir.
1. Get rid of
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:07 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Chris ():
How safe is it today to pre-compile Rakudo code to PIR and expect
that to
behave identically to as if I compiled from .pm at runtime? I
believe PCT
is just generating PIR anyway, so my initial guess is that there
should be
no
# New Ticket Created by Chris Dolan
# Please include the string: [perl #60160]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60160
The following simple test involves two .pm files that depend on each
other. In
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Oct 27 13:00:01 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Chris Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S05 always uses single curlies for closures, but throughout Parrot, code
seems to use double curlies in PGE regexps. Why is that?
That is, why this:
m/ foo {{ say found foo }} /
and not this:
m/ foo { say found foo }
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turns out setting the conditional breakpoint never fired; left this
running overnight, and it eventually came back with the segfault
directly. Back to the drawing board.
Here is a very small snippet of tcl (with a single
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #60166]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60166
Hello.
Exception handling in parrot doesn't unwind used stack frames.
Simple
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #60170]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60170
While trying to duplicate the tcl segfault in PIR, I was able to
generate PIR that
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:14 PM, via RT Will Coleda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #60170]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60170
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #60172]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60172
.sub _main
($S0) = 'blah'(:pir_only=1)
.end
segfaults with:
0xb7e4fe84 in
HaloO,
Jon Lang wrote:
This can already be done, for the most part:
/ (.does(ro)) /
Mind you, this only searches a list; to make it search a tree, you'd
need a drill-down subrule such as I outline above:
/ [* (.does(ro)) ]* /
Isn't it the case that ~~ has very special dispatch semantics?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:20:51PM +0100, TSa wrote:
HaloO,
Jon Lang wrote:
This can already be done, for the most part:
/ (.does(ro)) /
Mind you, this only searches a list; to make it search a tree, you'd
need a drill-down subrule such as I outline above:
/ [* (.does(ro)) ]* /
Isn't
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:47:12PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
moritz_ rakudo: if(3 5) { say yes } # that should fail
Early experimentation indicates that this goes for unless, while,
until and given as well, and probably others I can't think of now.
Just for the record (since the ticket
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:37:36PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
.sub 'main' :main
foo('Hello')
.end
.sub foo :multi(String)
.param pmc s
say s
.end
[...]
Which brings us to an interesting question: How can you decide what
type
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:47:50AM -0700, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
I've (slightly) refactor Junction.pir.
1. Get rid of junction_comparision_helper. Use infix_junction_helper
instead.
2. In infix and unary junction helpers store original value in
ResultHash to avoid stringification of
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:50:29AM -0700, François PERRAD via RT wrote:
In fact, perl6.exe contains some dependencies on build tree.
Just after a build, perl6.exe works :
This is a known item -- see line 32 of languages/perl6/README:
This binary executable feature is still somewhat
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:52:13AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
Chris Dolan wrote:
I stumbled across this issue while descending into a recursive Match
structure. Consider the following reentrant subroutine:
You have just experienced this bug:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:00:03PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Rakudo r32141 can understand unspaces consisting of a backslash
followed by whitespace, but not unspace consisting of only a
backslash.
$ ./perl6 -e 'my %h; %h{key} = value; say %h\ {key}' # works fine
value
$ ./perl6 -e 'my %h;
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:33:21PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Rakudo r32141 fails to accept undef as a value to typed variables.
$ ./perl6 -e 'my Int $a = undef'
Type check failed
[...]
Should work according to S02.
Yes, this is a bug in Rakudo. We're likely to be revising all of
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a very small snippet of tcl
SNIP
Attached is a PIR-only file (no tcl required) that triggers the same
GC-related segfault (tested in r32210)
--
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
(I suppose technically we should stop calling this a stack trace since
it's not a stack. But return continuation chain trace is just too
verbose.)
backtrace
Exactly the word I was looking for.
From: Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:32:02 -0500
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:37:36PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
.sub 'main' :main
foo('Hello')
.end
.sub foo :multi(String)
.param pmc s
say s
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:26:31 Bob Rogers wrote:
All true. But it's unfortunate that the Parrot type system considers
int and Integer unrelated. As a result, MMD prevents autoboxing
(when chromatic and I had expected otherwise).
I'm not sure it's the type system as much as it is
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:36:58 chromatic wrote:
I think I know how to promote primitive registers to their
autoboxed PMCs in that function; Parrot's calling conventions should take
care of the rest.
Fixed in r32211. All tests pass (including the TODO test I added for this).
-- c
From: chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:00:50 -0700
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:36:58 chromatic wrote:
I think I know how to promote primitive registers to their
autoboxed PMCs in that function; Parrot's calling conventions should take
care of the rest.
28 matches
Mail list logo
