Re: [perl #61106] Something doesn't work in hash indexing through a closure in Rakudo

Moritz (>), Carl (>>): >> Rakudo r33577 responds strangely to the following program: >> >> $ perl6 -e 'my $locator = method { . }; my %h = { here => "foo" >> }; say %h.$locator' >> get_pmc_keyed() not implemented in class 'Undef' >> [...] >> >> I'd expect it to output "foo". > > Is it actually spec

Re: Files, Directories, Resources, Operating Systems

* Aristotle Pagaltzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081204 16:57]: > * Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-04 16:50]: > > * Aristotle Pagaltzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081204 14:38]: > > > Furthermore, from the point of view of the OS, even treating file > > > names as opaque binary blobs is actually fi

Re: Files, Directories, Resources, Operating Systems

* Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-07 14:20]: > > > - you have XML-files with meta-data on files which are > > > being distributed. (I have a lot of those) > > Use URI encoding unless you like a world of pain. > > You are looking at it from the wrong point of view: Perl is > used as

Re: [perl #61074] perl6/parrot make spectest_regression failures

johnb (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by johnb > # Please include the string: [perl #61074] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61074 > > > > Hi, > > I was browsing the page: > > >> http://perlgeek.

Re: how to write literals of some Perl 6 types?

Dave Whipp wrote: > Carl Mäsak wrote: >> Paul (>): >>> I can't find anything in the existing synopses about Blobs. >>> Probably looking in the wrong place, sorry. >> >> > > Re-reading that, a slightly tangent (though still on topic, I hope) > thought

Re: [perl #60986] Win32 package refuses to install if not run by an administrator

Andrew Whitworth via RT wrote: > On Tue Dec 02 05:50:02 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think it is wrong that the Win32 installation package for Parrot >> refuses to install if not run by an administrator. >> >> I simply do not want to pollute my system and am therefore using a >> no

Re: [perl #41095] [BUG] Segfault in test.exe during Configuration

Tested with r33568. The bug is still there. - Original Message - From: "Will Coleda via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 10:00 PM Subject: [perl #41095] [BUG] Segfault in test.exe during Configuration Can someone test this with a re

[perl #61092] JSON/pge2pir.pir segaful on amd64

# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin # Please include the string: [perl #61092] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61092 > Hi! --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.22-3-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi cc=

[perl #61100] Calling .WHAT on an attribute with the type of the surrounding class doesn't work in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61100] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61100 > Rakudo r33577 can handle a .WHAT call on an attribute whose type is a class... $ perl6

[perl #61120] [BUG] Inherited classes doesn't provide initialisation of inherited attributes in constructor

# New Ticket Created by "Vasily Chekalkin" # Please include the string: [perl #61120] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61120 > rakudo: class A { has $.a }; class B is A {}; my $b = B.new(a=>"foo"); rakudo 33

[perl #61122] [TODO] Implement .pick on user-defined enums

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61122] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61122 > The following should return the months in random order: $ perl6 -e 'enum Month ; say Mo

[perl #61126] return should apply to the lexically enclosing routine, map is no exception

# New Ticket Created by Daniel Ruoso # Please include the string: [perl #61126] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61126 > The following two snippets of code are supposed to behave the same: sub bar($code) { $c

[perl #61128] some classes leak through from Parrot and cannot be declared in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61128] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61128 > rakudo: class Task {} [15:39] rakudo 33603: OUTPUT[Class Task already registe

Re: [perl #61116] AutoReply: test failing in trunk

> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:03:17 -0800, "Parrot via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > t/op/callingNOK 73/98 git bisect blames https://svn.perl.org/parrot/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- andreas

Re: [perl #41095] [BUG] Segfault in test.exe during Configuration

Thanks - can you also let us know the following: What version of windows are you using? Which compiler (including version)? On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Nikolay Ananiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tested with r33568. The bug is still there. > > - Original Message - From: "Will Coled

Re: [perl #61126] return should apply to the lexically enclosing routine, map is no exception

Daniel, in rakudobug ticket [perl #61126] (>): > The following two snippets of code are supposed to behave the same: > > sub bar($code) { $code() }; > sub foo { bar { return 1 }; return 2; }; say foo; > > and > > sub foo { map { return 1 }, 1; return 2 }; say foo; > > both are supposed to return "1

[perl #61106] Something doesn't work in hash indexing through a closure in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61106] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61106 > Rakudo r33577 responds strangely to the following program: $ perl6 -e 'my $locator = me

[perl #61088] [PATCH] show result of expressions in HLLCompiler based interactive REPLs

# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi" # Please include the string: [perl #61088] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61088 > the current HLLCompiler infrastructure seems to be an incomplete REPL, since it only

[perl #61130] :nth() does not work with :x() or :g in .subst in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61130] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61130 > The .subst method in Rakudo r33599 can understand :x()... $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3

bug reports

Hi! I have reported parrot bug at [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=61092 But mb I use wrong mail? I know you use Track now, and wonder why I got response from rt.perl.org instead of Track. ihrd

[Parrot] New comment on Episode 3: Squaak Details and First Steps.

srottak has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak Details and First Steps": Ok, I have 2 grammars: grammar test::Grammar is PCT::Grammar; rule TOP { * [ $ || ] {*} } rule foo { 'hello' {*} } and grammar test::Grammar is PCT::Grammar; rule TOP { * [ $ || ] {*} } rule expression

[perl #61102] Calling private methods with the string syntax doesn't work in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61102] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61102 > Rakudo r33577 can do private method calls. $ perl6 -e 'class A { my method x {}; method

[perl #61096] Null PMC access in get_string() when using return value from failed eval

# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #61096] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61096 > Rakudo r24153: # no error as expected $ ./perl6 -e 'eval "my &foo ::= { "foo" }; foo;"'

[Parrot] New comment on Episode 3: Squaak Details and First Steps.

kjs has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak Details and First Steps": refers to the rule (or token) expression. If you declare a rule "foo", and you want to use it, you need to put the pointy brackets around it, like . Posted by kjs to Parrot at December 6, 2008 7:14 AM

Boolean#perl

Prompted by the recent thread on literals... This is Rakudo Perl 6, revision 33618 built on parrot 0.8.1-devel This works: $ perl6 -e 'say Bool::True.perl' Bool::True This doesn't: $ perl6 -e 'say True.perl' Method 'perl' not found for invocant of class '' current instr.: '_block11' pc 26 (EVAL_

[perl #61104] [TODO] Implement array method dispatch

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61104] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61104 > This should work, according to S12: $ perl6 -e 'class A { method x(Int $a) { say "Int"

[perl #61124] [TODO] Implement .clone method on objects

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61124] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61124 > The following should work in Rakudo: $ perl6 -e 'class A {}; my $a = A.new.clone' Metho

[perl #61094] signature parsing and sub dispatch too permissive

# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #61094] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61094 > While reviewing some tests in t/blocks/ I've found some bugs in rakudo's signature parsin

[perl #61116] test failing in trunk

# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #61116] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61116 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-mult

[perl #61108] [TODO] 'my class' and 'our class'

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61108] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61108 > $ perl6 -e 'my class A {}' Could not find non-existent sub my $ perl6 -e 'our class A {

Re: [perl #59810] [PATCH] store hash seed in parrot_string_t struct

Christoph Otto wrote: I'd appreciate comments or a quick code review as to whether I should apply the patch as-is (sans randomization) once the failing OrderedHash test passes. It's admittedly not a complete solution, but it does hide Parrot's hash seed from any PARROT_EXPORT functions and mak