Daniel Carrera daniel.carrera-at-theingots.org |Perl 6| wrote:
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
So CPAN6 is basically only going to be for Parrot?
What are you talking about? Did you even read my email? I said that a
module might be implemented in multiple languages (see Digest::SHA VS
Digest::SHA::Pu
This code appears to be working for me:
$ cat 65412
class A {
has $!rx;
method do { $!rx = / xyz / }
}
A.new.do
$ ./perl6 65412
$
I suspect the problem is really with the evalbot attempting to evaluate
the returned regex in boolean context after the progr
This is now working properly in c907d37 ... assigning ticket for
spectest verification, and then it can be closed.
Thanks!
Pm
Chris Fields wrote:
Speaking as an almost complete outsider (I'm a bioperl core dev writing
up a perl6 port), I find the tone of several of these more recent posts
(re: CPAN6 and module conventions) counterproductive. TimToady recently
posted about snippiness and 'tensegrity', so I'm not the on
Rakudo now gives a much more useful error message for the case where
make() cannot set a result object:
$ cat 63800
grammar G {
regex TOP { 'a' {*} }
}
class GA {
method TOP($m) { make GA.new }
}
G.parse('a', :action(GA.new));
$ ./perl6 63800
make
This now works as of c907d37:
$ cat 61774
class A {
has @something is rw;
method doit {
@something = <1 2 3>;
say self!something;
}
my method something {
"Hello, world";
}
}
my A $a .= new;
$a.doit;
$ ./perl6 61774
Hello,
Now fixed in c907d37:
$ cat 61988
class A {
method foo { say @_; }
method bar { $.foo(42); }
}
A.bar;
$ ./perl6 61988
42
$
Assigning ticket for spectest verification.
Thanks!
Pm
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
So CPAN6 is basically only going to be for Parrot?
What are you talking about? Did you even read my email? I said that a
module might be implemented in multiple languages (see Digest::SHA VS
Digest::SHA::PurePerl) and someone might have both versions installed.
Daniel
Larry Wall larry-at-wall.org |Perl 6| wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:21:29AM -0700, yary wrote:
: I do see a problem if there's more than one unspecified dimension.
: Though I suppose an array of shape(*;*) as an lvalue might be a
: constraint allowing assignment only of another 2D array?
I d
Sounds like you are on the right track. Separation of concerns,
standardization of some of these solutions without regard to platform or
Perl implementation, and learning from prior art.
Richard Hainsworth richard-at-rusrating.ru |Perl 6| wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Mark Overmeer wrote:
C
Daniel Carrera daniel.carrera-at-theingots.org |Perl 6| wrote:
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
The front-end should figure out which binary is proper for your
platform.
I don't like that idea in the slightest. (1) It is not Perl's job to
know if you have a C compiler, C libraries and tool chain. (2) I
On Wed Dec 24 08:44:36 2008, dwh...@nvidia.com wrote:
> (rakudo 34337)
>
> >>> $_ = "a"; say /a/ ?? "yes" !! "no"
> yes
> >>> $_ = "a"; say /b/ ?? "yes" !! "no"
> Yes --- WRONG!
This now works as of fc01cda:
pmich...@orange:~/rakudo$ ./perl6
> $_ = "a"; say /a/ ?? 'yes' !! 'no';
yes
> $_ = "a";
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #66196]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=66196 >
rakudo: my $str="TEST"; say $str.bytes
rakudo d396ab: OUTPUT«ResizableStringArray: Can
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:14:14PM -0600, David Green wrote:
> On 2009-May-30, at 12:06 pm, David Green wrote:
> >...what "Perl6" is today, let alone what it will be tomorrow.
>
> Actually, we do kind of know what Perl will look like a decade from
> now, because P6 is deliberately extensible eno
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #66204]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=66204 >
rakudo: class Dog {}; say Dog.defined; Dog .= new; say Dog.defined
rakudo d396ab: OUTP
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-02 21:28:12 +0200 (Tue, 02 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 26990
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] require failure when digits exceed radix
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
--- docs/P
I haven't gotten deep into the shape/array specs and I need to... nonetheless
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
> I don't see why we shouldn't use the capture shape of the value
> by default all the time, and do linear reshaping only if the value
> comes in as a flat list.
This h
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:21:29AM -0700, yary wrote:
: I do see a problem if there's more than one unspecified dimension.
: Though I suppose an array of shape(*;*) as an lvalue might be a
: constraint allowing assignment only of another 2D array?
I don't see why we shouldn't use the capture shape
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, John M. Dlugosz > And it should be an
error if dimensions other than the highest are
> unspecified. How can it know how to shape it? Use an explicit command to
> shape up the argument in that case.
I don't see why shape(2;*) is not a problem and shape(*;2) is a
p
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Mark Overmeer wrote:
Currently in CPAN you have modules like:
Digest::MD5
Digest::SHA
Digest::MD5::Perl
Digest::SHA::PurePerl
The difference is that the first two are implemented in C and the
later two in Perl.
This is comparible to adding a "target" to each of the mod
>> I think that's something that perl6 could do better then APL.
If anyone would like to channel this APL energy into APL-on-parrot,
I'm sure it could some attention since the parrot 1.0 release. =)
http://parAPLegic.googlecode.com/
The original implementation was basically a proof of concept to
Mark Overmeer wrote:
Currently in CPAN you have modules like:
Digest::MD5
Digest::SHA
Digest::MD5::Perl
Digest::SHA::PurePerl
The difference is that the first two are implemented in C and the later
two in Perl.
This is comparible to adding a "target" to each of the modules, a
suggestion when
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
The front-end should figure out which binary is proper for your
platform.
I don't like that idea in the slightest. (1) It is not Perl's job to
know if you have a C compiler, C libraries and tool chain. (2) If my
computer can handle Perl, C and Parrot, I want the choice
> Currently in CPAN you have modules like:
> Digest::MD5
> Digest::SHA
> Digest::MD5::Perl
> Digest::SHA::PurePerl
> The difference is that the first two are implemented in C and the later
> two in Perl.
This is comparible to adding a "target" to each of the modules, a
suggestion when you starte
24 matches
Mail list logo
