Jon Lang asked:
Not actually S26; but closely related: should $=POD and .WHY be
read-only?
I had assumed so.
Also, should there be other Pod variables besides $=POD?
If so, which ones?
The original idea was that every Pod block with any kind of TYPENAME
would be available as $=TYPENAME.
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #69270]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=69270
masak rakudo: .say for Nil
p6eval rakudo 5d3d3a: OUTPUT«Nil()»
* masak submits
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #69272]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=69272
masak rakudo: my $a = 3/4; $a++
p6eval rakudo 5d3d3a: OUTPUT«Method 'succ' not found
On 2009-Sep-21, at 2:57 pm, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
So the preceding example reduces to:
+1, 2, 3 ...
+10, 20, 30 ...
+100, 200, 300 ... 1000
+
+These rules may seem complicated, but they're essentially just
replicating
+what a human does naturally when you say and so
On Mon Sep 21 22:30:12 2009, masak wrote:
masak rakudo: my $a = 3/4; $a++
p6eval rakudo 5d3d3a: OUTPUT«Method 'succ' not found for invocant of
class 'Rat'»
* masak submits rakudobug
This seems to be working as of e52ed31e2fe1ab2fd4a661ebeda78a880bad1215
$ ./perl6 -e 'my $a = 3/4; say ++$a'
2009/9/22 James Keenan via RT parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org:
On Wed Sep 17 16:38:22 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
We need a way to measure the extent to which Parrot's test suite covers
the Parrot specification.
As with RT #58740, this is a ticket whose functionality is not
absolutely
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:22:17PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
On Tue Jul 08 20:56:02 2008, s1n wrote:
When trying to use the --optimize flag, building perl6 causes parrot
to
segfault. Attached is the Configure.pl script output.
SNIP
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:22:17PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
On Tue Jul 08 20:56:02 2008, s1n wrote:
When trying
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:57:15PM +0200, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-09-21 22:57:15 +0200 (Mon, 21 Sep 2009)
New Revision: 28344
@@ -1809,10 +1808,83 @@
10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,
100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,900
+If the right operand is
