Re: Int/Rat max precision (was Re: r28882 - docs/Perl6/Spec)

2009-10-27 Thread Darren Duncan
I agree with TSa's comments in general. Make "Int" and "Rat" the roles, and people who don't care about precision-affected semantics can invoke those. Let the longer names be for the implementing classes, invoked directly by people who do care about precision-affected semantics. -- Darren Dunc

r28921 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-10-27 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-10-27 19:38:55 +0100 (Tue, 27 Oct 2009) New Revision: 28921 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [S02] make <1 2 3> literals more allomorphic Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod === --- docs/Per

Re: Int/Rat max precision (was Re: r28882 - docs/Perl6/Spec)

2009-10-27 Thread TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
HaloO, On Friday, 23. October 2009 02:27:00 Darren Duncan wrote: > Thinking further, my interpretation of what you said above is that the > Rational role is now basically saying that a number is represented in terms > of numerator/denominator and that certain operators are supported, but now > it

r28917 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-10-27 Thread pugs-commits
Author: jimmy Date: 2009-10-27 11:24:31 +0100 (Tue, 27 Oct 2009) New Revision: 28917 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [Spec/S02-bits.pod] fixed a typo, which should be 'throughout'. Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod ==