# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73502]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73502 >
rakudo: @_.=[3]
rakudo 0a0469: OUTPUT«Method '!postcircumfix:<[ ]>' not found
for invo
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73508]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73508 >
rakudo: say (1,2,4...*)[10]
rakudo 9786b0: ( no output )
* masak submits rakudobug
# New Ticket Created by Stefan O'Rear
# Please include the string: [perl #73504]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73504 >
$ perl6 -e 'say Foo::x'
Null PMC access in invoke()
current instr.: '_block14' pc 29 (E
This error has been fixed while rewriting most of the meta object system
in Perl 6. Tests are in meta-class.t
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73484]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73484 >
rakudo: multi x(%h($a, $b)) {}; multi x(%h($a, $b)) {}; x({:a, :b})
rakudo 5b81df: OUT
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73486]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73486 >
rakudo: .say for "hello";
rakudo 5b81df: OUTPUT«hello»
* masak submits rakudobug
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73488]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73488 >
rakudo: sub foo(%h($left)) {}; foo({ no => "left key" })
rakudo 5b81df: OUTPUT«Not eno
Status: Resolved
Great, then I'll close the ticket (let's see if RT does this
automatically...)
Stéphane Payrard wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Moritz Lenz via RT
> wrote:
>> Does this problem still persist with a current Rakudo?
>>
>
> nope
>
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Oh, wow. I was just asking about the spec; didn't know this stuff
> already worked. Rakudos to the team! :)
Actually there's quite much that works in Rakudo, even if some corner
cases are missing or error messages might benefit from more verbosity.
Especially in the area o
