Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model

2010-05-11 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Daniel Ruoso wrote: 2 - The interpreter implements a scheduler, just like POE. I don't have a clue about threading, but I saw POE, and since I know that's an event loop mechanism, I thought I'd comment that I want to be able to do GTK programming, which I think requires

Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model

2010-05-11 Thread Larry Wall
Since I don't think BrowserUK subscribes here, I'll paste in the remarks he attached to your earlier paste, just to help get the discussion going, and on the assumption this will not be regarded as antisocial. :) Larry BrowserUK wrote: > > -there are the interpreter processes. > > Inventin

Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model

2010-05-11 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Hi, The threading model topic still needs lots of thinking, so I decided to try out some ideas. Every concurrency model has its advantages and drawbacks, I've been wondering about this ideas for a while now and I think I finally have a sketch. My primary concerns were: 1 - It can't require lock

Re: [perl #75030] [PATCH] Lexical persistence & autoprinting for the REPL

2010-05-11 Thread Stefan O'Rear
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:25:47AM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: > 1. I don't like that it modifies the parameters of !UNIT_START. I see three alternatives - clone UNIT_START (DRY), inline UNIT_START in the PAST (DRY), and unify !RESUME_HERE with !YOU_ARE_HERE (makes modules run in the

Re: [perl #73796] rakudo compiler never builds due to thrashing

2010-05-11 Thread Karthik BP
Yes Moritz. It builds fine now. Thanks! -- Karthik On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Moritz Lenz via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Sat Apr 03 17:37:16 2010, karthik...@gmail.com wrote: > > Sure. I'll try. > > -- > > Karthik > > Did you have any success? > > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2

[perl #75010] [BUG] @x and @.x in class methods treated differently

2010-05-11 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth # Please include the string: [perl #75010] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75010 > See IRC May 10 @.x[1 .. +...@x] is not being treated (rakudo dies) in the same way

[perl #75026] [PATCH] Enable per-stage timing generation

2010-05-11 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stefan O'Rear # Please include the string: [perl #75026] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75026 > PCT has support for timing individual stages of a long compilation, but this functional

[perl #75030] [PATCH] Lexical persistence & autoprinting for the REPL

2010-05-11 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stefan O'Rear # Please include the string: [perl #75030] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75030 > > my $x = 10 10 > my $y = 1 1 > while $x { $y *= $x-- } > $y 3628800 > [*] ^10 0 > [*]

[perl #75008] [BUG] Null PMC access on 'nextsame' in multi sub in Rakudo

2010-05-11 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #75008] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75008 > rakudo: multi foo() { nextsame }; foo() rakudo 3d3893: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in clone