This segfault is gone, also:
$ perl6-p
> my Int $x = NaN;
Type check failed in assignment to '$x'; expected 'Int' but got 'Num'
> ^D
$
$ perl6-p --version
This is perl6 version 2015.01-60-g12db81b built on parrot 7.0.1 revision
RELEASE_7_0_1
So the same question as in ticket 115322: Is this c
This no longer results in a segfault:
$ perl6-p
> return
Attempt to return outside of any Routine
> last
$
$ perl6-p --version
This is perl6 version 2015.01-60-g12db81b built on parrot 7.0.1 revision
RELEASE_7_0_1
Is this closable or do we need a test for the rakudo.parrot REPL?
This no longer gives a NullPointerException:
$ perl6-j
> 'asa' ~~ /:s ^a* %
===SORRY!=== Error while compiling
Missing quantifier on the left argument of %
at :2
--> ⏏
$ perl6-j --version
This is perl6 version 2015.01-60-g12db81b built on JVM
Is this closeable or do we need a test for the r
This is another case where it makes a difference whether the command comes on a
single line or on two separate lines:
$ perl6-m -e 'say "a".subst(/(.)/,{$0~$0}); say "%20" ~~ /:i
\%(<[0..9A..F]>**2)/; say "a".subst(/(.)/,{$0~$0});'
aa
「%20」
0 => 「20」
aa
But with a newline in the echo command:
Some additions to this ticket: There is no error when both commands are on the
same line:
$ echo 'my int64 $t=0; $t.say' | perl6-m
0
The error is still reproducable when the commands are on separate lines (there
is a newline in the shell command):
$ echo 'my int32 $t=0;
$t.
The test was fixed with commit https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/88c52fa8a2
It now starts with
augment class Block {
method xyzzy(Code $x: *@y) { $x.(@y) }
}
I'm closing this ticket.
# Announce: Rakudo Star Release 2015.01
## A useful, usable, "early adopter" distribution of Perl 6
On behalf of the Rakudo and Perl 6 development teams, I'm happy to
announce the January 2015 release of "Rakudo Star", a useful and usable
distribution of Perl 6. The tarball for the January 2015 r
This works now with Rakudo:
$ perl6 -e 'my $x = 5; $x [R/]= 1; say $x'
0.2
$ perl6 -e 'sub r2cf(Rat $x is copy) { gather $x [R/]= 1 while ($x -= take
$x.floor) > 0 }; say r2cf(1.4142136)'
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 1 2 4 1 1 2
I added a test to S03-metaops/reverse.t with commit
https://github.com/p
I added test to S32-list/map.t with commit
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/4eb80b2d48
In case that test is not appropriate, please reopen the ticket (or change the
test).
Assignment to an undeclared dynamic variable fails now with a typed exception
"X::Dynamic::NotFound" and an adequate error message:
$ perl6 -e '$*x = 42'
Dynamic variable $*x not found
in method at src/gen/m-CORE.setting:14595
in any find_method_fallback at src/gen/m-Metamodel.nqp:2741
in
10 matches
Mail list logo