# New Ticket Created by Wenzel Peppmeyer
# Please include the string: [perl #126063]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126063 >
say sprintf('%f', 1, 2);
# outputs: Directives specify 1 argument, but 2 arguments we
On Thu Aug 27 03:06:07 2015, coke wrote:
> On Sat Mar 28 16:15:48 2015, esteiner wrote:
> > According to its definition, squish should always return at least the
> > first list element in the result list, no matter what &with returns.
> >
> > Currently it can happen that squish returns an empty lis
# New Ticket Created by Larry Wall
# Please include the string: [perl #126060]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126060 >
perl6-m -e 'for $[1,2,3] { .say }; .say for $[1,2,3];'
[1 2 3]
1
2
3
This showed up in the
[1 1 1 1]
next
[1 1 1 1 1 1]
next
[1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1]
vs
[1 2 3]
next
[1 2 3 3]
next
[1 2 3 3 3]
I think the latter is clearer, though perhaps the problem is the original
code is a bit overly-contrived (I'm thinking ;-). It shows better the
variation after each call, maybe. my 2.00e-02 dolla
The combination of different numbers on separate lines looks clearest to me.
On 9/14/15, yary wrote:
> Keep it on separate lines, I don't know how that formatting got lost (it's
> showing up as separate lines in my history).
>
> As for the rest of it, curious as to consensus.
>
> -y
>
> On Mon, S
Why?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:06 Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Neo4j, http://neo4j.com/ a graph database that looks interesting uses
> the JVM http://www.neo4j.org/java/jvm for its internal query language,
> Cipher http://neo4j.com/docs/stable/cypher-query-lang.html
>
> There could we
