# New Ticket Created by 宋文泰
# Please include the string: [perl #126172]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126172 >
```perl6 code
my @a = 1,2,3;
my @b;
@b.push: @a,;
```
@b is [1,2,3], not [ [1,2,3] ], is this a
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #126169]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126169 >
Works fine run standalone.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #126168]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126168 >
Works fine when run standalone.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
In C culture, a bare return means "This is a procedure, not a function, and I'm
not expecting to return anything", and so I think the absence of a meaningful
value is properly conveyed by Nil in Perl 6. If the intent of a return is to
allow interpolation of Slip or (), then that choice should b
> On 24 Sep 2015, at 13:59, Will Coleda via RT
> wrote:
> On Fri Mar 20 12:10:32 2015, coke wrote:
>> on OS X, I can run
>>
>> "use TeSt;"
>>
>> And it works. If we can error on that, we probably should.
>>
>
> perl 5 seems to do the same.
FWIW, this is on my radar… It should *not* do the s
On Tue Jun 29 15:37:31 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: "foo" ~~ /foo/; say "What kind of $()l am I?"
> rakudo 451b40: OUTPUT«What kind of l am I?»
> hm, shouldn't that say 'fool'?
> no
> rakudo: "foo" ~~ / foo {make "foo"} /; say "What kind of $()l am I?"
> pmichaud: what about that?
> masak:
On Thu Jun 28 08:14:23 2012, moritz wrote:
> < TimToady> oh, wait
> < TimToady> Variable matches are considered declarative if and only if
> the variable
> < TimToady> is known to represent a constant
> < TimToady> nr: constant $x = 'ab'; say ('ab' ~~ / a | b | $x /).Str
> <+p6eval> rakudo 88a9d6
This now works:
$ ./perl6 rt124242.p6
Bug.new(myself => (my \Array_4544383328 = [Bug.new(myself =>
Array_4544383328)]))
Closeable with tests.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #126163]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126163 >
Even if [perl #126146] and [perl #126147] are not bugs, that .map et
al go wrong *silently* is
This fudged test was removed as the desired behavior was changed as part of the
GLR.
Resolving ticket.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
Pretty sure this predates the GLR - the current behavior is that the list has
no holes, whereas we used to expect a Nil or a ().
This ticket can probably be closed (and the tests removed) with review.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
jn...@jnthn.net via RT wrote:
>A native type cannot hold an undefined value, so writing :U should
>be a compile time error (it could never match
I would expect the type object (int) to match the notional int:U
constraint. Rakudo is quite clear that (int) isa int, and obviously
it's not defined in
# New Ticket Created by Helmut Wollmersdorfer
# Please include the string: [perl #126160]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126160 >
[BUG]
[13:02] m: my uint64 $z = 0 +| (1 +< 62);say sprintf("%064b",$z);
[13:02
# New Ticket Created by "Tokuhiro Matsuno"
# Please include the string: [perl #126149]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126149 >
This code throws exception.
`use Test; is(Mu, Mu); done-testing;`
Output:
Cannot c
# New Ticket Created by Carlin Bingham
# Please include the string: [perl #126148]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126148 >
carlin m: <1176079147668/815>
camelia rakudo-moar f2488e: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: bab6c34833edd8f9cdfb8c6b61290c54e079ea49
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/bab6c34833edd8f9cdfb8c6b61290c54e079ea49
Author: jnthn
Date: 2015-09-23 (Wed, 23 Sep 2015)
Changed paths:
M S11-modules.
On Fri Mar 20 12:10:32 2015, coke wrote:
> on OS X, I can run
>
> "use TeSt;"
>
> And it works. If we can error on that, we probably should.
>
perl 5 seems to do the same.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #126159]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126159 >
The rejection of [perl #126146] and [perl #126147] as not bugs means
that the language features
18 matches
Mail list logo
