On Thu Jan 29 14:47:58 2015, rayd...@cyberuniverses.com wrote:
> Noticed during an IRC discussion, the real weirdness starts at
> http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2015-01-29#i_10028280 and goes to
> 22:00 .
>
> Another clue:
>
> perl6 -e 'subset Foo where {say "«$_.perl()»"}; my Foo $foo = 1;'
> «
On Thu Oct 22 20:25:49 2015, pesc...@gmail.com wrote:
> [...]
>
> This seems to work at the moment:
>
> 03:24 < psch> r: my $a = :b; say $a.key =:= $a.key
> 03:24 <+camelia> rakudo-{moar,jvm} 3df263: OUTPUT«True»
I unfudged the test in question with commit
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit
On Thu Sep 17 13:37:30 2015, FROGGS.de wrote:
> Fixed by jnthn++ with commit:
>
> https://github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/commit/60a48e85b4928a9d66f2f8b87c5fdb65633a7d99
This test file is failing on JVM on my box. reopening.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
This ticket is about a failing test in S05-modifier/counted-match.t which calls
.match with an infinite sequence as adverb :nth.
$ perl6-m -e 'my $data = "f fo foo fooo f fo foo"; my @match =
$data.match(/fo+/, :nth(2, 4 ... *)).list; say @match.perl'
[]
The test expects @match to h
> On 23 Oct 2015, at 18:30, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/23/15, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>> I would say it’s a DIHWIDT
>>
>
> "Doctor, It Hurts When I Do That"? - somewhere between options d & e, then?.
Well, actually c|d|e , I think :-)
> "So Don't Do That"?
Well,
On 10/23/15, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> I would say it’s a DIHWIDT
>
"Doctor, It Hurts When I Do That"? - somewhere between options d & e, then?.
"So Don't Do That"?
On Oct 23, 2015 7:21 AM, "Will Coleda" wrote:
> On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I’m very happy to announce the
October
> 2015 release of Rakudo Perl 6 #92 “Niceville”.
As the founder of the Niceville Perl Mongers (one member so far), I presume
to speak for our little town in Northwest
I would say it’s a DIHWIDT
Liz
===
> On 23 Oct 2015, at 15:21, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If someone is using Rakudo*, what are the implications of replacing
> the compiler with the monthly update? Is it
> a) a good idea,
> b) should be harmless
> c) a waste of
If someone is using Rakudo*, what are the implications of replacing
the compiler with the monthly update? Is it
a) a good idea,
b) should be harmless
c) a waste of time
d) a good way to confuse debugging efforts
or
e) a guaranteed way to bork the installation?
On 10/23/15, Will Coleda wrote:
> On
On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I’m very happy to announce the October
2015 release of Rakudo Perl 6 #92 “Niceville”. Rakudo is an implementation of
Perl 6 on the Moar Virtual Machine[^1] and the Java Virtual Machine.
This is the “Birthday” release of Rakudo Perl 6; It’s the first releas
# New Ticket Created by Lloyd Fournier
# Please include the string: [perl #126436]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126436 >
class Point2D {
has Int:D $.x is required;
has Int:D $.y = self.x;
}
Point2D
# New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen
# Please include the string: [perl #126433]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126433 >
[12:14:56] m: sub a(Int:D() $a) { dd $a }; a "42" # type smileys
not compl
12 matches
Mail list logo
