On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:28:47 -0700, b...@post.pl wrote:
> > And some C++ stackoverflow post claimed this was a bug in standard
> > library on macos that was fixed in some version already.
>
> I'll try to get you Sierra (10.12) and High Sierra (10.13) results tomorrow.
Added a test (in a branch)
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:28:47 -0700, b...@post.pl wrote:
> > And some C++ stackoverflow post claimed this was a bug in standard
> > library on macos that was fixed in some version already.
>
> I'll try to get you Sierra (10.12) and High Sierra (10.13) results tomorrow.
Added a test (in a branch)
Hi James,
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:19:34 -0700
James Ellis Osborne III wrote:
> Is compilation to bytecode still a todo feature? I managed to get a
> solution supporting compilation, serial-based locking, & license expiration
> delivered in Python last month for the nuclear industry.. Bytecode
>
> And some C++ stackoverflow post claimed this was a bug in standard
> library on macos that was fixed in some version already.
I'll try to get you Sierra (10.12) and High Sierra (10.13) results tomorrow.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> Set operators are a lot less useful with mutable types, like SetHash,
> because
> even when one of the operands is a SetHash, they still return a Set,
> making
> constructs like `∖=` or `∪=` entirely unusable:
>
> my $days = SetHash.new:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:15:56 -0700, coke wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:25:07 -0700, b...@post.pl wrote:
> > There is no strace on macOS, I used dtruss (dtrace):
> >
> > $ dtruss -p 1827
> > SYSCALL(args) = return
> > fstat64(0x0, 0x7FFF5B18B2F0, 0x1) = 0 0
> > lseek(
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:15:56 -0700, coke wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:25:07 -0700, b...@post.pl wrote:
> > There is no strace on macOS, I used dtruss (dtrace):
> >
> > $ dtruss -p 1827
> > SYSCALL(args) = return
> > fstat64(0x0, 0x7FFF5B18B2F0, 0x1) = 0 0
> > lseek(
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:25:07 -0700, b...@post.pl wrote:
> There is no strace on macOS, I used dtruss (dtrace):
>
> $ dtruss -p 1827
> SYSCALL(args) = return
> fstat64(0x0, 0x7FFF5B18B2F0, 0x1) = 0 0
> lseek(0x0, 0x0, 0x1) = 54132 0
> write(0x1, "Nil\n\0", 0x
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:25:07 -0700, b...@post.pl wrote:
> There is no strace on macOS, I used dtruss (dtrace):
>
> $ dtruss -p 1827
> SYSCALL(args) = return
> fstat64(0x0, 0x7FFF5B18B2F0, 0x1) = 0 0
> lseek(0x0, 0x0, 0x1) = 54132 0
> write(0x1, "Nil\n\0", 0x
[Coke]++ bisected it to
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/80bbfcdd47bcb27c21352a53a5156a6ecdd41e65
On 2017-10-22 12:25:07, b...@post.pl wrote:
> There is no strace on macOS, I used dtruss (dtrace):
>
> $ dtruss -p 1827
> SYSCALL(args) = return
> fstat64(0x0, 0x7FFF5B18B2F0, 0x1) = 0 0
> lsee
Frankly, if you're worried about this sort of thing, you have too much
faith in "secret sauces", and not enough in understanding situations
thoroughly. Code is trivial, implementation isn't.
Back in the days of dBase II, I was a contractor for one ministry of
the local government. They asked me to
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Brandon Allbery
> wrote:
> > This is still best discussed elsewhere... isn't there a stackexchange for
> > this kind of stuff?
>
> Ah, Stack Exchange, the quality site where the _first_ answer is the
> mo
I agree that this is really not the appropriate forum for this. Type a
question like "if I write the same code for several clients, who owns
it?" into a search engine, and you'll get a plethora of links.
In this case, I would say the fairest thing is to write the sharable
portion once on your own
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #132353]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132353 >
This code produces an LTA error:
my %days := SetHash.new: Date.today … Date.new: '203
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #132352]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132352 >
Set operators are a lot less useful with mutable types, like SetHash, because
even when on
OK, first of all, thank you for the report. The issue is indeed there, and in
my opinion it's a significant problem.
Secondly, ♥👍 for trying to bisect it manually. Nowadays I only do it with a bot
unless I have to trisect rakudo+nqp+moar.
However, the result of bisection is wrong (as far as I can
Hi Mark,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:37:31 +
Mark Devine wrote:
> Perl 6 Users,
>
> [[ Bouncing off Re: who own my code? ]]
>
> This is the first of several possible spin-off questions, but here goes…
>
> Perl 6 has its public ecosystem, which will drive growth and adoption. Then
> there’s th
17 matches
Mail list logo
