Re: [perl #132426] binary checksum

2017-11-10 Thread foehn via RT
Hi, Thanks a lot for your reply. Sorry for being ambiguous -- I was referring to the rakudo star releases. Yeah, I guess it would be super if you sign or checksum the rakudo star releases, as they are binary installers. Thanks again! -- Original -- From: "Al

[perl #132426] binary checksum

2017-11-10 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
OK. I created this issue for rakudo star: https://github.com/rakudo/star/issues/106 I'll mark this ticket as resolved. See the ticket linked above to follow the actual progress on the issue. 🤗 On 2017-11-10 17:20:56, fo...@foxmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for your reply. > > Sorry for b

Re: [perl #132426] binary checksum

2017-11-10 Thread foehn
Hi, Thanks a lot for your reply. Sorry for being ambiguous -- I was referring to the rakudo star releases. Yeah, I guess it would be super if you sign or checksum the rakudo star releases, as they are binary installers. Thanks again! -- Original -- From: "Al

Re: [perl #132226] AutoReply: "impossible" undefined value in concurrent ENTER phasers

2017-11-10 Thread David Lowe via RT
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:38 PM, perl6 via RT wrote: > Greetings, > > This message has been automatically generated in response to the > creation of a trouble ticket regarding: > ""impossible" undefined value in concurrent ENTER phasers", > a s

Re: [perl #132225] AutoReply: segmentation fault while concurrently updating SetHash

2017-11-10 Thread David Lowe via RT
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:10 PM, perl6 via RT wrote: > Greetings, > > This message has been automatically generated in response to the > creation of a trouble ticket regarding: > "segmentation fault while concurrently updating SetHash", > a sum

[perl #129812] [OPTIMIZER] `is rw` candidates get called even if a non-rw argument is passed

2017-11-10 Thread Christian Bartolomaeus via RT
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:27:09 -0700, b...@abrij.org wrote: > On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 06:28:34 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net > wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:23:57 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > > > > > > This code shows the bug: > > > > > > zoffix@leliana:~$ perl6 -e 'm: multi foo ($) {"right"

[perl #126823] [BUG] Failing test in S32-array/adverbs.t and S32-hash/adverbs.t: Code does not die as expected with 'use '

2017-11-10 Thread Christian Bartolomaeus via RT
The tests in S32-array/adverbs. and S32-hash/adverbs.t (and all code snippets in this ticket) are passing again. I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.

[perl #132426] binary checksum

2017-11-10 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
Hello! Thanks for the report. Are you referring to rakudo releases or rakudo star releases? Both don't come with checksums, but rakudo releases *are* digitally signed. Compare: * https://rakudo.perl6.org/downloads/rakudo/ * https://rakudo.perl6.org/downloads/star/ So do we need checksums for bot

Re: [perl #132226] AutoReply: "impossible" undefined value in concurrent ENTER phasers

2017-11-10 Thread David Lowe
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:38 PM, perl6 via RT wrote: > Greetings, > > This message has been automatically generated in response to the > creation of a trouble ticket regarding: > ""impossible" undefined value in concurrent ENTER phasers", > a s

Re: [perl #132225] AutoReply: segmentation fault while concurrently updating SetHash

2017-11-10 Thread David Lowe
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:10 PM, perl6 via RT wrote: > Greetings, > > This message has been automatically generated in response to the > creation of a trouble ticket regarding: > "segmentation fault while concurrently updating SetHash", > a sum

[perl #132426] binary checksum

2017-11-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by foehn # Please include the string: [perl #132426] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132426 > Dear Rakudo distributors, Thanks for making Rakudo available. One piece of suggestion -maybe it

Re: [perl #131774] [PERF] Simple, if artificial, string concatenation example hogs memory and time

2017-11-10 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
Same, but with the new Telemetry module so you can see better what’s going on: $ perl6 -MTelemetry -e 'for (1, 10, 100, 1_000, 10_000, 100_000) -> $limit { snap; my $x; my $y = "x" x 100; $x ~= $y for 1..$limit }' Telemetry Report of Process #79213 (2017-11-10T16:24:00Z) Number of Snapshots: 7 N

Re: [perl #131774] [PERF] Simple, if artificial, string concatenation example hogs memory and time

2017-11-10 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
Same, but with the new Telemetry module so you can see better what’s going on: $ perl6 -MTelemetry -e 'for (1, 10, 100, 1_000, 10_000, 100_000) -> $limit { snap; my $x; my $y = "x" x 100; $x ~= $y for 1..$limit }' Telemetry Report of Process #79213 (2017-11-10T16:24:00Z) Number of Snapshots: 7 N

[perl #131774] [PERF] Simple, if artificial, string concatenation example hogs memory and time

2017-11-10 Thread Daniel Green via RT
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:49:39 -0700, ronaldxs wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:32:12 -0700, lloyd.fo...@gmail.com wrote: > > I did an experiment a while ago and found that string concatenation > > in a > > loop was Ο(n²) in rakudo. I asked about it on irc and jnthn explained > > to me > > that this w