> On 13 May 2019, at 14:26, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I tried to report a failure to rakudobug, which generated the
> following report from the mailer:
> -
> ---
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:59:32 -0700 (PDT
On Mon, 13 May 2019 10:28:25 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:26:17 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Code:
> > say Hash[Int].new(‘abc’ => 20..50)
> >
> >
> > Result (2015.12):
> > Type check failed in binding $x; expected Int but got Range
> > in block
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:26:17 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> Code:
> say Hash[Int].new(‘abc’ => 20..50)
>
>
> Result (2015.12):
> Type check failed in binding $x; expected Int but got Range
> in block at /tmp/CRJOhWZaTS line 1
> «exit code = 1»
>
>
> Result (HEAD):
> {abc => 20..50
I would assume this is still fallout from the Perl NOC maintenance weeks. Will
pass this on to the people in the know. Thanks for the report!
> On 13 May 2019, at 14:26, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I tried to report a failure to rakudobug, which generated the
> following repo
I tried to report a failure to rakudobug, which generated the
following report from the mailer:
-
---
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
** Message not delivered **
Your message couldn't be delivered to rakudo...@per
