be undef as long as the message
is begin composed.);
.has $content_type = 'text/plain';
}
--
Aankhen
(We have no branches.)
. As for XHTML 2.0,
that's still a long way off. :-)
--
Aankhen
(We have no branches.)
code.
--
Aankhen
(We have no branches.)
On 9/21/06, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because they speak the same language. That is: they know about arguments
passed via forms, and the preferred output language (xhtml? html?).
Ah, I didn't think of that. My bad. Roles for all these things sound
great to me. :-)
Aankhen
On 9/19/06, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Aankhen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-17 21:00]:
XHTML 1.0 and 1.1 offer no practical benefits over HTML, but
tangible disadvantages.
To be fair, XHTML does let you embed MathML and SVG (as well as
XForms, pending browser support) in your
. There needs to be a Web.pm toolkit (or
something similar), but that's mostly an amalgamation of other
modules.
Aankhen
On 9/20/06, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did qualify my statement.
I'm sorry, I must have missed it. :-)
Aankhen
be any elements that only work in certain
browsers (with the exception of abbr... no others I can think of
offhand).
Aankhen
--
I meant *our* species.
You said *your* species.
Evidently I am insane. May I go now?
import HTTP::Request::CGI and
HTML::Generator (I'm throwing names out at random, although I did
write HTTP::Request::CGI as a subclass of HTTP::Request whose members
are populated in a manner similar to CGI.pm's parsing of %ENV).
Aankhen
--
I meant *our* species.
You said *your* species.
Evidently I
On 23 Feb 2006 14:15:21 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log:
Typo, plus audrey forgot to increment version.
There seems to be another typo on the same line: just as method like
instead of just as methods like.
Aankhen
--
Why don't you go on a diet!
Because I like to eat! Is that a crime?
calling it the interrobang operator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang? :-D
Aankhen
an unflattened array or a hash in a sub call
without any special syntax...
Aankhen
))`?
Aankhen
On 7/29/05, Flavio S. Glock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is for = only for filehandles? I tried:
No, it's for anything that supports iteration... `=$foo` ==
`$foo.next()`, if I recall correctly. It's probably not yet
implemented.
Aankhen
[sorry Luke, I hit Send too soon]
On 7/27/05, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is probably a better word than contains. I was thinking set
theory when I came up with that one.
What about derives?
Aankhen
the `atomic` block? Or did I
miss something?
Aankhen
mind.
Well, you've certainly got everyone flustered enough that they'll be
overjoyed even if you pick the alternative they hated the most... :-)
Aankhen
alternative that doesn't involve outlawing it?
Aankhen
will contain either bar or baz, depending on which one was matched.
Hope this is helpful. Corrections are welcome from anyone who spots
any mistakes.
Aankhen
On 5/31/05, Carl Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running `make clean` on WindowsXP is dying with an expanded command
line too long error.
You need to get a later version of nmake. The latest is 7.10, I believe.
Aank
20 matches
Mail list logo
