On Sun Jul 08 02:13:13 2012, thoughtstream wrote:
> Father Chrysostomos pointed out:
>
> > I said when, not whether. :-)
>
> Isn't that just typical of me: confusing ontology with chronology. ;-)
>
> I'm afraid don't know the implementation details for Rakudo. It may be
> bound as the surroundin
On Sat Jul 07 22:23:16 2012, thoughtstream wrote:
> Father Chrysostomos asked:
>
> > What I am really trying to find out is when the subroutine is actually
> > cloned,
>
> Yes. It is supposed to be (or at least must *appear* to be),
> and currently is (or appears to be) in Rakudo.
I said when, n
I’m forwarding this to the Perl 6 language list, so see if I can find an
answer there.
[This conversation is about how lexical subs should be implemented in
Perl 5. What Perl 6 does may help in determining how to iron out the
edge cases.]
On Sat Jul 07 13:23:17 2012, sprout wrote:
> On Sat Jul 0
On Sat Jul 07 18:35:03 2012, tom christiansen wrote:
> "Father Chrysostomos via RT" wrote
>on Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:44:46 PDT:
>
> > I’m forwarding this to the Perl 6 language list, so see if I can
> find
> > an answer there.
>
> I do have an answer
On Tue Aug 17 21:46:38 2010, coke wrote:
> Here's a simple program if you're lazy and want to cut and paste
> something to test:
>
>
>
> sub recursion($a) {
> recursion($a)
> }
>
> recursion("see also");
>
That example (with the bad prototype stripped) just gives me:
perl(5674) malloc: ***
