I felt submitting an RT on
that module, either.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
There's too much blood in my caffeine system.
e" is useful in some ways and not in others, it seems. The most
useless part of it is the "published modules list", and IMO we should
get rid of the thing.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"I've decided to rename [Connect's Melbourne border router] 'Madi's Pants'
because it keeps dropping." -- Madi (from the Netizen quotes file)
he module from there.
Thinking of attacking perlmodlib next, and removing a lot of those long
lists. I'm pretty sure we're better off pointing to web resources for
most of the gunk that's in there.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.
Hi Ask, perl6-meta, and perl6-stdlib,
Today at YAPC in the Perl 6 session there was some discussion of modules
and what work needs doing in that area for Perl 6.
Basically it breaks down the following two topics:
WHAT goes into the core? (covered by perl6-stdlib)
HOW do we write Perl 6 modules
As many of you may know, I've recently moved to the other side of the
world, and my life's a bit hectic. I hadn't counted on p6-l bursting
into life just now, and while I'd like to keep right up to date with it
I really can't guarantee daily reading.
Would anyone like to volunteer to do weekly s
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:13:30PM -0500, Adam Turoff wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 05:03:12PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > There's obvious FUD out there and we don't seem to be giving the impression of
> > getting much done, or doing anything to counter it.
>
> Let's be fair. We're not ge
I've got one ready to go on the topic of "Perl 6: the story so far".
I'm presenting it next week at linux.conf.au and would be happy to
submit it for YAPC and/or TPC.
K.
other languages are great. they are a source of features to
steal^Wborrow.
INTERCAL
except maybe intercal
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:28:31AM -0800, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>
> Anyways, that's just one suggestion. Do I have any idea where to find
> these mythical people? No, unfortunately. Perhaps some feelers on
> newsgroups might be a good place to start. Personal experience shows
> that this could be a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:05:43AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> David Grove wrote:
>
> > Also, as far as documentation goes, I think it _should_ be written by
> > apprentices, so that non-masters can understand it too. That's always been
> > a huge criticism of the perldocs. That's not grunt work.
10 matches
Mail list logo
