they pass or not. That's a pretty standard TAP interpretation.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
could add the option for 2D graphs as well. But I'm not sure that will be enough for more than a
couple of days worth of data. Maybe I need to find something smarter than GD::Graph for large data
sets. Any ideas?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
-languages project. But it might be helpful
to have each big language (Rakudo, pipp, cardinal) have their own
projects so that they have their own RSS feeds.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
/harness and runs all of the tests. It would be
really easy to just run --core-tests or to create a new option to t/harness.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
is only 6 months. Some
distros provide support for several years.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
itself for downloading/quering.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
Can we get the tag information included in the RSS summary articles?
Absolutely. Try to wget
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/feed/8/failed and you
can see them there now.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Magnuszewski
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). He has most of the automated smokers sending
to Smolder.
For the future, how would we like to identify who is running the smoker
sending the reports?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Will Coleda wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Coleda wrote:
The user associated with these builds is 'parrot-autobot'. Anyone know
who that is?
That's the Smolder user that make smolder_test uses. Otherwise I'd have to
give out an account
Will Coleda wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon Jul 21 11:15:15 2008, coke wrote:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/details/8
Clicking on the Data Feeds links
/app/public_projects/feed/8 (all)
/app/public_projects
that's where
the problem was. Can you refresh the XML feed and check the URLs?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
James Keenan via RT wrote:
Since we've applied and refined the patches that Michael Peters
originally submitted, is there any particular reason to keep this RT open?
Not that I can think of. Close away!
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
and will try to get to them today. Right now I have a
screaming infant to get out of a high chair :)
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
/report_details/2310
Take this patch for spin and see if it's more to your liking.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Index: lib/Parrot/Harness/Smoke.pm
===
--- lib/Parrot/Harness/Smoke.pm (revision 29611)
+++ lib/Parrot/Harness/Smoke.pm (working
to the _get_svn_revision() number and
expanding it to cover git and svk. But looking at recent discussions on
this list it seems that the best way is to just pull it from %PConfig.
The 2nd one can just be turned into a comment about what is possible.
Patch attached.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Michael Peters wrote:
Here's some more patches to improve things. It adds the following:
+ require TAP::Harness::Archive 0.10 so we can add extra_properties to our
TAP
archives.
+ Collect Architecture, Compiler, DEVEL, Optimize, Perl Version, Platform,
SVN
Revision
/report_details/1396
Just click on one of the Ok or Failed boxes and there should be a TAP link
that will popup with the raw TAP stream for that file.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Index: lib/Parrot/Harness/Smoke.pm
===
--- lib
only if they are trying to do make smolder_test.
I'm at $work currently, but I'm planning on working on these things tonight. So
patches will be forth coming.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
James Keenan via RT wrote:
What is this parrot_test_run.tar.gz?
The make smolder_test target is supposed to create it. It's the TAP archive.
Does it exist anywhere on your system?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
chromatic wrote:
T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make smolder' (and
eventually I hope 'make smoke'), so probing for it without bundling it seems
eminently sensible to me.
Agreed. That's what we do with TAP::Harness::Archive.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
that later.
So now the question is how do I send this as a patch. It touches several files
and adds new ones. Is a simple svn diff good enough? If so, it's attached.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Index: lib/Parrot/Harness/Options.pm
::Harness)
3) Change the buildbot setup you already have to run the tests and then submit
the TAP archives to the Smolder server. This should be pretty simple once I've
gotten the changes to t/harness.
Questions? Comments? Verbal abuse?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
for me. It's just for smoke testers, not anyone
running normal tests or doing normal dev work.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
. And I certainly prefer talking SQL at a
database than writing throwaway helper script code to manipulate
serialised data structures.
And if you use DBD::SQLite you don't even need that. I has everything you'd
need.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
by the environment, so that under
normal testing the developers don't see too much clutter, but the harness itself
could ask the tests to emit as much data as it wants.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
believe we also have an ACTION: tag.
another useful meta info for TAP:
# LINENO: (pugs links test messages to higlighted version of the test script)
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
::* modules.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
that.
This doesn't resolve the problem of non-test modules emitting things to STDERR
that could be useful when tracking down bugs, but what they might print is not
TAP, so can't really be associated with particular tests.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
. It can even email developers when a test fails
unexpectedly.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 01:46, Michael Peters wrote:
Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 22:35, chromatic wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:05, Shlomi Fish wrote:
This debate demonstrates why a plugin system is necessary for a test
harness.
No, it demonstrates
try to avoid that by making sure that we have one *good*
test harness codebase that can be customised using plug-ins, and extensions?
How about a good TAP parser module that does nothing but parse TAP. Then
it could be used in all kinds of test harness permutations.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
comments on the test run.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
test
modules on CPAN I'd volunteer to change them :)
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
Matisse Enzer wrote:
On Mar 5, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
Matisse Enzer wrote:
After some trouble, I managed to create a distribution tarball for my
patched Redhat 8 system from smolder-0.01-src using
bin/smolder_makedist.
Thanks for trying this out so soon. It's been
Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:09:00 -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
It's very similar in nature to the Pugs smoke test server, but is completely
project agnostic. It's also completely self contained (contains local copies
all
of it's Perl modules and a local apache/mod_perl
in the package, although
lib/Class/DBI.pm uses it. SO for the moment, I'm stuck.
Thanks for catching this. I've uploaded 0.02 to sourceforge. Could you give that
a try?
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
/screenshots.php?group_id=161136
And other details here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/smolder/
While completely functional, this is an alpha release so it is not feature
complete.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
months
:)
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
part of the sqlfairy.sourceforge.net project.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 2005-11-22, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stevan Little wrote:
Michael,
You might want to look at some of the work on the Pugs test suite.
http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl
It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
Test::TAP
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:01:18PM -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and uses YAML as an intermediate test-run format.
Actually, Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix is what I currently use for test reports
that
get
wrapped around TAP would be to collect other
information that TAP does not provide, like platform, date and time run, time to
completely run, and if applicable developer name.
Does any of this seem reasonable? Overkill? Already done?
Thanks,
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
me more to think about.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
, the it is completely non-intuitive.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
If we broke this out into a formal logical proof, the only way
that x,x != y,z would would is if x != y or x != z, or both.
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP
Fergal Daly wrote:
On 7/2/05, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if we say
x=y and x=z can we then say that x,x != y,z
If say
$x = [];
$y = [];
$z = [];
is_deeply($x, $y); # passes
is_deeply($x, $z): # passes
is_deeply([$x,$x], [$y, $z]); # fails for some reason
If we
47 matches
Mail list logo
