Hi,
I'm just starting with Perl 6. I was reading through "Perl 6 and Parrot
Essentials" (finally arrived yesterday from Amazon; very happy) and I was
wondering what would happen if you had a parameter list that included
variables of a different type but the same name (ie, $foo, @foo). I wrote a
: my %h;
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = @v;
:
: But is there an easy way in Perl6 to do it all in one go? Should this
work?
:
: my %h = @k [=>] @v;
Reduce operators only turn infix into list operators. What you really
want here is a hyper-fatarrow:
my %h = @k »=>« @v;
Gaal pointed out using zip
I was thinking of rewriting a little webserver program I wrote in Perl 5
using Pugs. I was wondering what the equivilent (if any) of IO::Socket is.
I suppose I could use an external webserver and use CGI to get this working
with IO, but my preference would be a pure Perl 6 approach.
If you're wo
I asked this same question on perl6-users, but no one really seemed to have
a definitive answer, so please forgive me for reasking.
I was wondering how named arguments would work when parameters of different
types had the same name, ie sub foo($bar, @bar, &bar) {...}. I wrote a
little script to
Mostly, it's that func('&x' => 1) requires a bit too much typing, and also
makes it hard for func() to change its signature later on to accept things
other than Code.
I was discussing this with a friend of mine (Eric Livak), and he suggested
making the sigil on the name optional for disambigua
Hi,
I wanted to start working on a module (mainly to learn Perl 6, I doubt
anyone would ever want to use it). I want to do this "properly," whatever
that means. I was wondering if someone could explain to me:
1) How to construct the Makefile.pl
2) How exactly to set up and run tests
I realize
> $foo.subst(:g, /bar/, "baz")
>
i seem to recall
$foo.subst(/:g bar/, "baz")
is valid syntax already.
If I'm not mistaken, the aversion to that syntax- as implied earlier in this
thread- was that the :g is really a modifier on the substitution, not on the
matching. (Please correct
same
effect, but it seems that fork also isn't available. Was I missing
something, or are these just features that I need to wait for?
Thanks,
Michael
On 9/8/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
在 Aug 25, 2006 12:54 AM 時，Michael Snoyman 寫到：
> I was thinking of rewriting
If Perl6 CGI.pm is intended to be the successor of the P5 CGI.pm (the
quasi-standard for Perl web programming) is should really get a modern
design.
I agree completely. In that vein, I think that one thing a lot of web
developers would like to have available more easily would be session
man
On 9/14/06, Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having had some prior experience in tackling this problem (eg,
CGI::Portable), I will endeavour to work on / help with the Perl 6
analogy to HTTP::Request/Response, so to replace the use of
corresponding aspects of CGI.pm.
I really like thi
I just recently got interested in Perl 6 (within the past two months), and I
found that reading the book was a good kick-start. Sure, lots of stuff has
changed, but many of the general ideas still seem to hold true.
Michael
On 9/18/06, Agent Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/19/06, [EMAIL
On 9/19/06, Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, the book is still an OK primer on the high-level concepts, it just
needs to be made clear that on both the Parrot and Perl sides, it's
quite a bit out of date. Even the names have changed in some cases (e.g.
IMCC is now known as PIR).
On 9/20/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
don't "just leave this to the community." take part! take advantage of
the perl 6 wiki (http://rakudo.org/perl6/index.cgi) and create a page
describing the task. write some code yourself. ask folks to
contribute, and fix the existing code or add t
13 matches
Mail list logo
