1389781327557747838772170381060813469985856815104
1). That's only accurate to 10**83. Which is to say, it's as accurate as
a double gets -- 16-17 digits. (BTW, that is a legal Rat.)
I admit don't really know what to do with this.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
should have is a quick and easy
way to convert from Num to FatRat with minimal loss of precision. I
believe right now the default Num -> FatRat conversion also uses 1e-6 as an
epsilon, which seems wrong to me.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
ndental constants like pi and e, with trig and
> log/exponentiation functions using them. Then Perl 6 could get this famous
> relationship *exactly right*:
>
> say 1 + e ** (pi * i)
>
> ... though I suspect it really does take a symbolic math package to get
> all combinations of
>
> Grammar.parse($file.slurp)
>
> since Grammar.parse() works on a Str, not a IO::Handle or Buf. Or am I
> misunderstanding how this could be accomplished?
My understanding is it is intended that parsing can work on Cats
(hypothetical lazy strings) but this hasn't bee
Full list of "Texas" (ie ASCII) set operators:
union: (|)
intersection: (&)
set difference: (-)
symmetric difference: (^)
subset: (<=)
proper subset: (<)
superset: (>=)
proper superset: (>)
is an element of: (elem)
is contained by: (cont)
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:45
ed in Perl6? No implementation of the perl6 set
>>> specification yet exists (AFAIK).
>>
>>
>> You are wrong. Both rakudo and niecza implement significant subsets of the
>> set specification.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Moritz
>
>
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
s implementation is that it always
tests against the first 256 primes, so it also takes advantage of this
in correctness, if possibly not in speed.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
ples:
2, 5 ... 11 # smartmatch is true when you hit 11
2, 5 ... True # stop right away
2, 5 ... False # never stop
2, 5 ... * # shorter way of saying never stop
2, 1, 1/2 ... Num # stop when the number switches from a Rat to a Num
'a' ... /f/ # stop when the regular expression matches
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
ics, please create a new ticket.
>
> https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=105272 >
23.542323.round still hangs in p6eval as of 30 seconds ago.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Moritz Lenz via RT
wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 05:04, schrieb Solomon Foster (via RT):
>> # New Ticket Created by Solomon Foster
>> # Please include the string: [perl #83356]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about
ot;second", etc. So what should happen if I try to apply a
> hyperoperator with a Bag or Set on one side?
Well, hyperoperators work fine on Hashes, they operate on the values,
paired up by key if needed. (That is, %hash>>++ doesn't care about
the keys, %hash1 >>+<<
x27;infix:<+>' at line 6752:CORE.setting
>> in main program body at line 1
>>
>> So it looks like it's just totally unwilling to try to use that inline:<+>
>> that I've defined, and instead is dead-set on trying to convert my BigTest
>> to a Num
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jon Lang wrote:
> Solomon Foster wrote:
>> Ranges haven't been intended to be the "right way" to construct basic
>> loops for some time now. That's what the "..." series operator is
>> for.
>>
>>
in the series operator. Range is not supposed to do any of that stuff
other than the most basic forward sequence.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
for example) isn't actually supposed to work, is it?
Certainly doesn't work in Rakudo and I've never seen a spectest
written like that...
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
thanks all of our contributors and sponsors for
making Rakudo Perl possible, as well as those people who worked on parrot, the
Perl 6 test suite and the specification.
The following people contributed to this release:
Solomon Foster, Moritz Lenz, Jonathan Worthington, Martin Berends,
chromati
-1, 1, -2, 2, -3, 3, -4, 4, -5, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10)»
That is, adding a .Seq between the two sorts clears up the problem.
That is admittedly a hack, but it is a simple one.
Thanks for reporting the problem!
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
d).
And just to finish it off... are you allowed to do 'class B { ... }'
even after "declaring the real B"?
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Ovid
wrote:
> --- On Tue, 5/1/10, Solomon Foster wrote:
>
>> From: Solomon Foster
>
>> > Is this a bug or just documented behavior that I don't
>> know about?
>>
>> fail just returns an uncalled exception. What
say "before";
> foo('no_such_file');
> say "after";
>
> Output:
>
> Houston, we have a filename: /Users/ovid/bin/perl6
> before
> after
>
> Is this a bug or just documented behavior that I don't know about?
fail just returns an uncalled exception. What does that do in a where block?
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
eing
> efficient with common pathological cases such as very large or very small
> rationals with a small amount of precision, such as the above, as well as
> for exactly reflecting the concept of a radix-agnostic floating-point
> number.
What's your objection to FatRat.new(45207196, 11 ** 37)?
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Solomon Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
>> Solomon (>), Moritz (>>):
>>>> the current spec doesn't allow immutable containers to call .map with a
>>>> block that implicitly uses $_
il() on detecting a
>>> modification? Somehow this approach seems very backward to me...
>>
>> Is there a reason $_ is readonly isn't a possible solution?
>
> For one thing, then you couldn't do this:
>
> my @a = 1, 2, 3;
> for @a {
> ++$_;
> }
I mean
rary variable be created that
> can be changed, without any effect? or should it fail() on detecting a
> modification? Somehow this approach seems very backward to me...
Is there a reason $_ is readonly isn't a possible solution?
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
n (/tmp/DZhXZHeJmV:2)»
>
> Since The Big Complex/Trig Refactor all these produce the same output.
>
> colomon, are you comfortable with our test coverage? If yes we can close
> this.
Yes, I think there are enough trig tests these days. :)
Thanks for cleaning these up.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
mplex problem on #perl6 yesterday? No rush whatsoever, I think your
PGE stuff is more important, and besides, I could use a few days where
working on Rakudo trig functions isn't stealing time from my $work.
(Rakudo is much more -Ofun than my $work is at the moment.)
--
Solomon Foster: co
1.5 { when Range.new(from => 1, to => 2, by => 1/3) {
say 'between one and two' }; say 'not'; };
p6eval rakudo 4b141a: OUTPUT«between one and two»
makes me very leery. I know :by isn't actually implemented yet, but
what should it do here when it is?
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
he iceberg.)
>
> Since the visible tip of the iceberg is usually about 1/9 th of the
> volume, I'm looking forward to another 8k tests ;-)
Seriously, I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being something like that.
> I don't worry if that skews any spectest sta
drastically improved from the first one I sent out.
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
0001-Fix-Rat.perl-to-return-N-M-rather-than-Rat.new-N.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Switch-GCD-routine-to-use-instead-of-for-a-vast.patch
Description
the code for the old Int / Int, but S03 suggests the
> edge cases should be a bit different.
> 2. Something is broken in temporal.t, presumably indicating something
> is broken in Temporal.pm.
> 3. Rat.perl is probably a bit silly, considering that "N/M" should work.
>
> -
rakudo: my @a = gather loop (my $i = 1; $i < 10; $i++) { take $i }; @a.perl.say;
p6eval: rakudo 7717c4: OUTPUT«[10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10]»
--
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com
31 matches
Mail list logo
