Damian Conway wrote:
Mark A. Biggar wrote:
Expect wouldn't that produce a extra blank line if $text is short?
Nope. Formats only generate text lines if at least one of their fields
interpolates at least one character.
Damian
What if I want to interpolate an empty string and let the
Luke Palmer wrote:
Mark A. Biggar writes:
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:59:15AM -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
: Smylers --
:
: So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
: above". In the example, the column range for the overflow fie
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:59:15AM -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
: Smylers --
:
: So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
: above". In the example, the column range for the overflow field is
: exactly the same as that of the $method field in the pr
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The other question is does Parrot care about the memory being zero'd out?
Isn't necessary. Executable mem is filled with ops anyway. Currently it
is zeroed to aid debugging a bit. It should be filled up with trap
operations o
OOPS, totally miss-read your code, ignore my first part of my last
message.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luke Palmer wrote:
I was reading the most recent article on perl.com, and a code segment
reminded me of something I see rather often in code that I don't like.
Here's the code, Perl6ized:
... ;
my $is_ok = 1;
for 0..6 -> $t {
if abs(@new[$t] - @new[$t+1]) > 3 {
$is_
Mark A. Biggar wrote:
0x (Unicode as code-points up to 0x10FFF), as either two 16 bit
Oops that should be 0x10^^^
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:57:14PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
You're going to run into problems no matter what you do, and as
transcoding could happen with each comparison arguably you need to make a
local copy of the string for each comparison, as otherwise you run the
ris
Austin Hastings wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Luke Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:23 PM
To: Jeff Clites
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Block Returns
Jeff Clites writes:
Speaking to the practical side, I have written code
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:39:20AM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:15:06AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
So the question is: What happens when indexof isn't on the call chain,
but that inner closure is?
But how can the inner closure be called if not
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, here's an issue for everyone. I'm writing the MMD subsystem, at
least the parts needed for operator overloading, and I'm coming across the
need to defer adding functions. For example, the Float class has functions
for the Integer class, and vice versa, and we can't guaran
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:40:44PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Actually, I'm thinking of something like the following... suppose the
original code is like:
label_foo:
loop body
branch_address:
branch label_foo
Add in the following:
e_handler_foo:
.local Perl
Alex Burr wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
I would hope the former. However, what about this compile-time
integral power macro[1]?
macro power ($x, $p) {
if $p > 0 {
{ $x * power($x, $p-1) }
}
else {
{ 1 }
}
}
That would hopef
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Well, we can make objects and we can call methods on objects (at least
the interface is specified, if not actually implemented) but actually
building classes to make objects out of is still unspecified. So, time
to remedy that, after which I hope we can build at least a simpl
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:26:22PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Multimethod dispatch?
Assuming I'm not misunderstanding what Adam is after, this has come up
before (I think I asked about value based dispatch a few months back)
and I can't remember if the decision was that MMD didn't exten
Hildo Biersma wrote:
>
> > =head1 ABSTRACT
> >
> > There needs to be a way for an object class to define C format
> > specifiers for use in formatting objects into strings with C and
> > C.
>
> I find myself agreeing with your sentiment, but the approach in this RFC
> is not sufficiently general
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
