Michael G Schwern wrote on 16 December 2004 23:06
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:59:00PM -, Orton, Yves wrote:
Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter
this file this
will affect all make dist commands?
Only if that module doesn't have its own MANIFEST.SKIP.
Ok, that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on 16
December 2004 16:45:01 +1100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Savige) wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
is even worse: 1 second again on 5.8.6/perl-malloc versus 56
seconds on 5.8.4/system-malloc!
I'm pretty sure realloc() is the culprit here.
A common trick used by string
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:03:52PM -, Orton, Yves wrote:
Perhaps you've got a damaged default MANIFEST.SKIP. Check what
perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP looks like. It should
look like this.
http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/lib/ExtUtils/MAN
IFEST.SKIP
Not Test::More's MANIFEST.SKIP. The system's default MANIFEST.SKIP.
ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP.
Run perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP and see if it looks like either
of
the urls above.
Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter this file this
will affect all make dist
Perhaps you've got a damaged default MANIFEST.SKIP. Check what
perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP looks like. It should
look like this.
http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/lib/ExtUtils/MAN
IFEST.SKIP
Not like this.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:59:00PM -, Orton, Yves wrote:
Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter this file this
will affect all make dist commands?
Only if that module doesn't have its own MANIFEST.SKIP.
Is there any chance the default could have .bak added in future
Yves Orton wrote:
http://svn.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/Test-Simple/trunk
or
svn://svn.schwern.org/CPAN/Test-Simple/trunk
or
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.54.tar.gz
or
a CPAN near you.
Should the t/fork.t tests should still be skipped on Win32? Win32 Perl
has
been
Orton, Yves wrote:
Your patch needs to account for PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS too like
t/op/fork.t does, as Schwern just pointed out.
Ok, ill look into that test to see how it works.
I should have mentioned that rather than just ithreads in my mail.
PERL_IMPLCIT_SYS is, in fact, also the
Not quite. I'm saying: Unless you need fork you're probably
better off using a perl without PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS [on Win32,
obviously]. There's no problem with having ithreads enabled;
it's PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS that requires perl's malloc to be disabled.
Got it. Ok, sorry to be so thick.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:06:36PM -, Orton, Yves wrote:
Primary key fingerprint: B484 04B8 E9D5 93A2 5CA8 F1AA 4F82 E2DC 2C3F
3F34
== SKIPPED CHECKING 'Makefile'! (run Makefile.PL to ensure its integrity)
===
Ok, talked to Autrijus.
Schwern But what's that SKIPPED CHECKING
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:06:36PM -, Orton, Yves wrote:
Also Schwern, ive been trying to get it to build from the zip file linked
above. The first time I build i get the following test failure:
t\00signature.WARNING: This key is not certified with a
trusted signature!
Orton, Yves wrote:
Yves Orton wrote:
http://svn.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/Test-Simple/trunk
or
svn://svn.schwern.org/CPAN/Test-Simple/trunk
or
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.54.tar.gz
or
a CPAN near you.
Should the t/fork.t tests should still be skipped on Win32?
Your patch needs to account for PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS too like
t/op/fork.t does, as Schwern just pointed out.
Ok, ill look into that test to see how it works.
I should have mentioned that rather than just ithreads in my mail.
PERL_IMPLCIT_SYS is, in fact, also the reason that I don't build
Steve Hay wrote:
And this program (500,000 small extensions to a string):
my $a = '';
my $start = time;
for my $i (1 .. 50) {
print $i\n if $i % 1000 == 0;
$a .= '.' x 20;
}
printf OK (%d seconds)\n, time - $start;
is even worse: 1 second again on 5.8.6/perl-malloc versus 56
14 matches
Mail list logo
