Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 13 March 2004 07:28, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.sub open method
Or, maybe .sub foo method as an alternative syntax?
This would allow other characters than now in sub names, too.
I've now allowed
Hi,
On Saturday 13 March 2004 07:28, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
.namespace [Source]
.sub open method
.pcc_begin_return
.pcc_end_return
.end
fails with
error:imcc:parse error, unexpected PARROT_OP, expecting IDENTIFIER
Parrot opcode names
Hi,
.namespace [Source]
.sub open method
.pcc_begin_return
.pcc_end_return
.end
fails with
error:imcc:parse error, unexpected PARROT_OP, expecting IDENTIFIER
jens
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
.namespace [Source]
.sub open method
.pcc_begin_return
.pcc_end_return
.end
fails with
error:imcc:parse error, unexpected PARROT_OP, expecting IDENTIFIER
Parrot opcode names are basically reserved words. There are some
exceptions, where the lexer