Re: [Introspector-developers] Re: Bytecode metadata

2003-01-28 Thread Gopal V
If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote: Bah. That's parrot -o foo.o foo.pmc isn't it? And if we make C a parrot supported language we can even build parrot with parrot? Hmmm... bootstrapping 1. The gcc : I have %99 of the information about the function bodies of

Re: [Introspector-developers] Re: Bytecode metadata

2003-01-27 Thread James Michael DuPont
--- Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess in future once the normal JIT works, and we've got the pigs flying nicely then it would be possible to write a Not Just In Time compiler that saves out assembly code and relocation