On Sat Aug 29 03:18:43 2015, coke wrote:
> On Thu Aug 21 13:12:32 2014, coke wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 07 13:07:46 2012, kristofbogae...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > p6: sub s_s(*%n) { %n>>.say }; s_s(|{:assoc}, :assoc);
> > > #
> > > which one is correct?
> > > rakudo e75a0a: OUTPUT«duplicate named argumen
On Thu Aug 21 13:12:32 2014, coke wrote:
> On Thu Jun 07 13:07:46 2012, kristofbogae...@gmail.com wrote:
> > p6: sub s_s(*%n) { %n>>.say }; s_s(|{:assoc}, :assoc); #
> > which one is correct?
> > rakudo e75a0a: OUTPUT«duplicate named argument in call in block
> > at /tmp/ohG08nWXj0:1»
> > nie
On Thu Jun 07 13:07:46 2012, kristofbogae...@gmail.com wrote:
> p6: sub s_s(*%n) { %n>>.say }; s_s(|{:assoc}, :assoc); #
> which one is correct?
> rakudo e75a0a: OUTPUT«duplicate named argument in call in block
> at /tmp/ohG08nWXj0:1»
> niecza v18-6-ge52d6c3: OUTPUT«left» 21:54:05
>
> p6: s
# New Ticket Created by Kristof Bogaerts
# Please include the string: [perl #113546]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=113546 >
p6: sub s_s(*%n) { %n>>.say }; s_s(|{:assoc}, :assoc); #
which one is correc
