Still reproducible (2017.11, HEAD(5929887)).
The issue with X was a regression that was resolved in RT#125689, so right now
even the original snippet shows the problem.
On 2015-09-14 20:18:54, b...@abrij.org wrote:
> On Mon Sep 14 20:17:00 2015, b...@abrij.org wrote:
> >
> > Behavor change:
> >
>
On 10/19/2012 09:59 PM, Parrot Raiser wrote:
> If the same sort of problem, (in this case "LTA Error Message"), keeps
> showing up. maybe it would be better to rethink the mechanism, rather
> than patch each individual case?
So how could a rethinking of the error detection mechanism look like?
Ch
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant the process of identifying errors and generating messages.
> (Using "mechanism" as a generic classification.)
>
That tends to come from people actually trying to use perl6 for something
new, which usually comes
> "LTA" is not a mechanism. It means "less than awesome"; the point is that
> we want error messages that make actual sense to the user
Understood, (though I thought the "A" was for "Adequate").
I meant the process of identifying errors and generating messages.
(Using "mechanism" as a generic c
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the same sort of problem, (in this case "LTA Error Message"), keeps
> showing up. maybe it would be better to rethink the mechanism, rather
> than patch each individual case?
>
> (As an ignorant kibitzer, I may well ha
If the same sort of problem, (in this case "LTA Error Message"), keeps
showing up. maybe it would be better to rethink the mechanism, rather
than patch each individual case?
(As an ignorant kibitzer, I may well have missed the point.)
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #115364]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=115364 >
r: package X is Associative { }
rakudo d171b9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Method 'add_
