[perl #127143] Different Behaviour With/Without Commas in Sub/Method Calls and slipped hashes

2018-05-21 Thread Brian S. Julin via RT
On Mon, 21 May 2018 09:13:15 -0700, b...@abrij.org wrote: > Note if we fix | to use fake infix adverbs, then we create the problem > that |(1,1),(2,2),:f :g will be 1,1,:g,(2,2),:f. ...sorry that might be OK due to the "first pair in term position"... but |(1,1),(2,2),1 :g will be 1,1,:g,(2,2),

[perl #127143] Different Behaviour With/Without Commas in Sub/Method Calls and slipped hashes

2018-05-21 Thread Brian S. Julin via RT
Without the comma, the colonpair is in infix position, which means it applies to the prefix unary | operator. So whether this should be an error or "work" depends on what we can teach the | operator to do with fake_infix adverbs it is passed. Note if we fix | to use fake infix adverbs, then we

[perl #127143] Different Behaviour With/Without Commas in Sub/Method Calls and slipped hashes

2016-01-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #127143] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127143 > I think this is related to https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127134 The code bel