On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:12:09 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> There was a comment on IRC from someone who doesn't have an account
> (http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-06-30#i_12762654 ):
>
> use Module :ONLY;
>
> I do like :ONLY more than my original :SYM
Just got bitten by this in real-life
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:12:09 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> There was a comment on IRC from someone who doesn't have an account
> (http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-06-30#i_12762654 ):
>
> use Module :ONLY;
>
> I do like :ONLY more than my original :SYM
Just got bitten by this in real-life
Something like this has also passed through my head.
What about use Test :ALL<&is &ok> or use Test :SOME-TAG<&foo &bar>.
so you can filter out what you want with arguments to the tag. This seems
to be better and more backwards-compy because with current rakudo use Test
:ALL<&is &ok> will still wo
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #128090]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128090 >
Currently, there seems to be no easy way to import only specific symbols from a
module *a
