On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:29:50 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> Something fishy going on with the Signals enum. If that's fixed then
> the
> regression you pointed out will be fixed as well, as the new method
> simply
> uses enum's `.value` to get the signal number:
>
> c:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:29:50 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> Something fishy going on with the Signals enum. If that's fixed then
> the
> regression you pointed out will be fixed as well, as the new method
> simply
> uses enum's `.value` to get the signal number:
>
> c:
We now have a note in the docs about this. When fixed, change the docs
accordingly (*maybe* saying that versions before X are known to have a bug).
https://github.com/perl6/doc/commit/39e3efc08d
See IRC discussion: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-09-01#i_15103501
On 2017-09-01 03:33:34,
# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev
# Please include the string: [perl #132012]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132012 >
Code:
say +SIGUSR1
Result:
30
However, on my system SIGUSR1 is
