Re: [perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-24 Thread Steve Fink
Sorry about the late reply to this. I wrote up the first 2/3 immediately after seeing Josef's message, but got sidetracked by Real Life. Then when I came back to it, I noticed that it had already exceeded the length threshold that usually means I'm rambling incoherently. And I probably am, so you

Re: [perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-09 Thread Josef Hook
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:46:38PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > > Steve Fink wrote: > > > Here is the new PMC I keep babbling about. Before I commit it, any > > > comments? Like, does anybody think this should be named differently? > > > It's really a dequ

Re: [perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-08 Thread Steve Fink
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:46:38PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > Steve Fink wrote: > > Here is the new PMC I keep babbling about. Before I commit it, any > > comments? Like, does anybody think this should be named differently? > > It's really a dequeue (double-ended queue), ... > > I for one think

Re: [perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-05 Thread Steve Fink
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:47:11AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Steve Fink (via RT) wrote: > > ># New Ticket Created by Steve Fink > ># Please include the string: [perl #17039] > ># in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > ># http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Displa

Re: [perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Steve Fink (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Steve Fink > # Please include the string: [perl #17039] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17039 > Why intarrary.pmc: > +=item B(in PMC, in PMC) ...

Re: [perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-05 Thread John Porter
Steve Fink wrote: > Here is the new PMC I keep babbling about. Before I commit it, any > comments? Like, does anybody think this should be named differently? > It's really a dequeue (double-ended queue), ... I for one think it ought to be called what it is - a dequeue. -- John Douglas Porter

[perl #17039] [PATCH] intarray aka integer dequeue PMC

2002-09-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steve Fink # Please include the string: [perl #17039] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17039 > Here is the new PMC I keep babbling about. Before I commit it, any comments? Like, does a