Re: [perl #23039] [PATCH] event handling-2

2003-09-20 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:06:09PM +, Leopold Toetsch wrote: # New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #23039] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23039 RT says that

Re: [perl #23039] [PATCH] event handling-2

2003-08-01 Thread Benjamin Goldberg
Leopold Toetsch wrote: OK here it is. Again the description for the record: 1) Initialization: - normal core: build op_func_table with all opcode #4 [1] - CG core: build ops_addr[] filled with this opcode - prederef cores: build a list of (backward) branch instructions

Re: [perl #23039] [PATCH] event handling-2

2003-08-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Benjamin Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: OK here it is. Again the description for the record: 1) Initialization: - normal core: build op_func_table with all opcode #4 [1] - CG core: build ops_addr[] filled with this opcode - prederef cores: build a list

Re: [perl #23039] [PATCH] event handling-2

2003-07-31 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ event checking without runloop penalty ] 3) So when the next instruction (normal, CG core) or the branch instruction (prederefed cores) gets executed, first the op_func_table or the patched instructions are restored and then the event handler

Re: [perl #23039] [PATCH] event handling-2

2003-07-19 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Here is a small patch on top of #23039 - fix memory corruption for very small programs - fix misplaced #endif leo --- interpreter.c Fri Jul 18 17:53:13 2003 +++ /opt/src/parrot-leo/interpreter.c Sat Jul 19 11:07:48 2003 @@ -202,13 +202,16 @@ void **temp = (void

[perl #23039] [PATCH] event handling-2

2003-07-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #23039] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23039 OK here it is. Again the description for the record: 1) Initialization: -