Re: [perl #39329] Check to make sure PMC_str_val, etc. are used appropriately

2008-05-07 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:38:56PM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: I think this ticket is ready to be closed. A lot of the PMC_* items were likely fixed as part of the pdd15oo change, and the problem I cited has apparently been fixed. Looking a bit further, there are still a few

[perl #39329] Check to make sure PMC_str_val, etc. are used appropriately

2008-05-06 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
I think this ticket is ready to be closed. A lot of the PMC_* items were likely fixed as part of the pdd15oo change, and the problem I cited has apparently been fixed. Pm

[perl #39329] Check to make sure PMC_str_val, etc. are used appropriately

2006-06-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #39329] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39329 PMC_str_val and family aren't guaranteed to work for subclasses, so they