On Sat Feb 17 13:49:37 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 15 February 2007 08:24, Matt Diephouse wrote:
If you wanted to send me some sample code that invoked both a normal
sub
and a MultiSub, I'd certainly take a look. I'm pretty sure the whole
idea
of invoke-able objects was
On Sun Mar 16 10:57:07 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt, chromatic:
This test is still in TODO status as of r26404. Can you provide us with
an update as to the ticket's status?
Thank you very much.
kid51
Sure. I investigated the issue a while back, and the whole thing is basically
On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:16:06 Matt Diephouse via RT wrote:
Sure. I investigated the issue a while back, and the whole thing is
basically stalled. The code surrounding the issue (the packfile code) is a
bit of a mess, which made finding a real fix difficult. I started to work
on refactoring
chromatic wrote:
To recap, I think this bug will require a substantial refactoring and
cleanup of the packfile code. For now, I believe it's a non-trivial bug
(except, perhaps, for someone with a more thorough understanding of the
packfile code).
Agreed.
Same here.
I believe Jonathan
On Thursday 15 February 2007 08:24, Matt Diephouse wrote:
If you wanted to send me some sample code that invoked both a normal sub
and a MultiSub, I'd certainly take a look. I'm pretty sure the whole idea
of invoke-able objects was never really thought out -- some of the logic in
Sub.invoke()
via RT chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #41511]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41511
Hi there,
Here's a complex one. Define a
