At the time I got this email, it was still failing when I applied the
patch, but with r18394 it's currently working again without problems.
A full make test passes with only previously failing errors.
On May 1, 2007, at 2:11 PM, chromatic wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2007 11:18:20 Joshua Isom
chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2007 11:18:20 Joshua Isom wrote:
I've done realclean a few times actually. If I run with r18322, it
runs just fine, but r18323, which dealt with zero length mallocs for
strings, caused it to start crashing. Here's a backtrace. This is
On Sunday 29 April 2007 11:18:20 Joshua Isom wrote:
I've done realclean a few times actually. If I run with r18322, it
runs just fine, but r18323, which dealt with zero length mallocs for
strings, caused it to start crashing. Here's a backtrace. This is one
of those tests where with -G it
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #42792]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42792
My current svn repository uses a patch that I sent to the list about a
week ago, in
Joshua Isom (via RT) wrote:
My current svn repository uses a patch that I sent to the list about a
week ago, in which the pge tests would run with gc on if the file
DEVELOPING existed. Since I updated to over 18323,
t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.t segfaults after test 553. The
current_cont
On Apr 29, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
Joshua Isom (via RT) wrote:
My current svn repository uses a patch that I sent to the list about a
week ago, in which the pge tests would run with gc on if the file
DEVELOPING existed. Since I updated to over 18323,
