Bob Rogers wrote:
. . .
I think you will have to send me your test case, or at least a more
detailed recipe. I do not see how the above sequence of events can lead
to a dangling reference to a deleted sub -- unless there is also a GC
bug, in which case I am unlikely to be able to reproduce
From: Bram Geron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:19:39 +0200
I'm sorry -- I wrongly assumed that marking a context doesn't mark its
current_sub, but it does. I thought it wasn't necessary (lexpad holds
all the info we'd need). The segfault I got must have been a symptom
Bob Rogers via RT wrote:
From: Bram Geron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:19:39 +0200
I'm sorry -- I wrongly assumed that marking a context doesn't mark its
current_sub, but it does. I thought it wasn't necessary (lexpad holds
all the info we'd need). The segfault
# New Ticket Created by Bram Geron
# Please include the string: [perl #43462]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43462
Firstly, there are some clearups in clearups.patch, I think they're
self-explanatory.
From: Bram Geron (via RT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:53:50 -0700
# New Ticket Created by Bram Geron
# Please include the string: [perl #43462]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
From: Bram Geron (via RT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:53:50 -0700
# New Ticket Created by Bram Geron
# Please include the string: [perl #43462]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
