At 08:25 27/10/2007 -0700, you wrote:
On Tue Oct 02 13:39:30 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot is no longer licensed under the GPL directly (though it is
available under the GPL through the Artistic 2.0). Update or remove
references to the GPL license in these files:
debian/copyright:45
On Tue Oct 02 13:39:30 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot is no longer licensed under the GPL directly (though it is
available under the GPL through the Artistic 2.0). Update or remove
references to the GPL license in these files:
debian/copyright:45
Removed mention of some
On Saturday 27 October 2007 08:25:57 Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
languages/regex/lib/Regex/Grammar.pm:
(c) Copyright 1998-2001 Francois Desarmenien, all rights reserved.
This file is automatically generated. So what do we do with files in
such cases? It is generated from Parse::Yapp, so
Also, need to change license reference in editor/pasm.el. (It currently
gives a URL for Artistic 1.0.)
Allison
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #46007]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46007
Parrot is no longer licensed under the GPL directly (though it is
available
Allison Randal (via RT) schrieb:
Review these languages and decide whether to update the license or move
them to the google-code repository for Parrot languages:
languages/m4/README:15
What is the legal situation for Parrot m4?
Personally I would like to put 'languages/m4' under
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
languages/m4/README:15
What is the legal situation for Parrot m4?
Personally I would like to put 'languages/m4' under Artistic 2.0.
But I'm not sure whether this isn't a derived work. I implemented Parrot
m4 by:
i. Looking at the GNU m4 source code
ii.
